2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.07.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endometrial thickness after ovarian stimulation with gonadotropin, clomiphene, or letrozole for unexplained infertility, and association with treatment outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A systematic review and meta-analysis in 2019 showed no difference in terms of clinical pregnancy, live birth, spontaneous miscarriage, or twin gestation between letrozole and CC for unexplained infertility (43). A Multicenter randomized controlled trial in 2020, showed that gonadotropin, clomiphene, or letrozole reached the same pregnancy outcomes (44). However, a study by Usama M Fouda et al indicated that the extended letrozole regimen had a significantly greater pregnancy rate per cycle and cumulative pregnancy rate than CC in unexplained infertility patients underwent superovulation combined with IUI (42).…”
Section: Letrozole For Unexplained Infertilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A systematic review and meta-analysis in 2019 showed no difference in terms of clinical pregnancy, live birth, spontaneous miscarriage, or twin gestation between letrozole and CC for unexplained infertility (43). A Multicenter randomized controlled trial in 2020, showed that gonadotropin, clomiphene, or letrozole reached the same pregnancy outcomes (44). However, a study by Usama M Fouda et al indicated that the extended letrozole regimen had a significantly greater pregnancy rate per cycle and cumulative pregnancy rate than CC in unexplained infertility patients underwent superovulation combined with IUI (42).…”
Section: Letrozole For Unexplained Infertilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A systematic review and meta-analysis in 2019 showed no difference in terms of clinical pregnancy, live birth, spontaneous miscarriage, or twin gestation between letrozole and CC for unexplained infertility ( 43 ). A Multicenter randomized controlled trial in 2020, showed that gonadotropin, clomiphene, or letrozole reached the same pregnancy outcomes ( 44 ). However, a study by Usama M Fouda et al.…”
Section: Letrozole For Unexplained Infertilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quaas et al examined both the effect of stimulation protocol on endometrial thickness and whether endometrial thickness in these cycles was associated with live birth rates. 34 Accordingly, higher live births were observed with increasing endometrial thickness, but the relation was nonsignificant when adjusted for ovulation induction agents. 34 In line with these studies, we observed no significant difference between pregnant and nonpregnant patients regarding the endometrial thickness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Overall, most literature has shown that better pregnancy outcomes are observed with increasing EMT, which is in line with our results. For example, a study showed that within gonadotropin treatment IUI cycles, the mean EMT in women achieving the outcome of live birth was greater than those who failed, and 12.2% of live births were observed in cycles with an EMT of more than 13 mm [25]. Quaas et al stated a positive association between peak EMT and PR in the setting of gonadotropin cycles with a peak EMT as between 10.5 and 13.9 mm [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results indicated that a growing mean number of follicles was connected with increased HMG dose but limited to three. Gonadotropin cycles tend to access more follicles than oral treatment, including clomiphene citrate and letrozole [7,25]. More follicles do have more opportunity to get fertilized, but excess follicles could not contribute to PR and LBR because synchronization among different follicles would damage the endometrial receptivity [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%