2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.08.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma after Insertion of a Levonorgestrel-releasing Intrauterine System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding this case study, the development of endometrial cancer was not prevented by the presence of the LNG‐IUS despite negative hysteroscopy prior to insertion. Similar cases have been documented in four previous individual case reports (19–22). This patient was at an increased risk of developing the condition given her morbid obesity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Regarding this case study, the development of endometrial cancer was not prevented by the presence of the LNG‐IUS despite negative hysteroscopy prior to insertion. Similar cases have been documented in four previous individual case reports (19–22). This patient was at an increased risk of developing the condition given her morbid obesity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In their three cases who had hysterectomy for persistent atypical hyperplasia, uterine histopathologic study indicated atypical hyperplasia in two cases and stage IA endometrial cancer in the third case [34]. Additional cases of persistent atypical hyperplasia or progressing into cancer in the presence of LNG-IUS have been reported [35,36]. These observations together with the two cases of endometrial cancer raise the question of whether the LNG-IUS should be used in the presence of atypical endometrial hyperplasia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Only seven cases were reported in the literature to date (table 1). [11][12][13][14][15][16] Our patient is unique due to Figure 3 The same field as in figure 2 and with the oestrogen receptor stain, which shows strong nuclear staining of the tumour cells (strongly positive).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%