1986
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1986.tb05471.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endometrioid carcinoma of the prostatic utricle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Immunohistochemical markers for PSA and PAP, with better antigen retrieval methods, have answered the question of the origin of this tumour. In all but two reports [ 14, 15] the tumours have been positive for PSA and PAP. In the present study all the ductal areas were positive for both antigens, confirming the earlier reports and supporting the belief that the tumour has a prostatic histiogenesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Immunohistochemical markers for PSA and PAP, with better antigen retrieval methods, have answered the question of the origin of this tumour. In all but two reports [ 14, 15] the tumours have been positive for PSA and PAP. In the present study all the ductal areas were positive for both antigens, confirming the earlier reports and supporting the belief that the tumour has a prostatic histiogenesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In our series PSA and PSAP were positive in all DAC cases, while prostein was negative in 3.4% of cases. There have also been reports of PSA‐negative DAC cases indicating that, for diagnostic purposes, a combination of prostate‐specific markers should be employed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This opinion is predominantly based on the fact that, since the advent of immunohistochemistry, almost all reported cases have stained positively for prostate specific antigen (PSA) and prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP). There are two reported cases where this staining has been negative however 2,3 . Despite these exceptions to the now accepted endometrioid phenotype, the proposed origin of this lesion as a mü llerian derived tumour arising from the vestigial uterus in the male have now been all but rejected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%