2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-62515-7_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endonasal and Transoral Approaches to the Craniovertebral Junction: A Quantitative Anatomical Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of note, the methods of this study were replicated from previous peer-reviewed anatomic studies both from our group and in the literature. 13,[34][35][36][37][38][39][40]…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Of note, the methods of this study were replicated from previous peer-reviewed anatomic studies both from our group and in the literature. 13,[34][35][36][37][38][39][40]…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intracranial arteries were injected with red silicone rubber. 13,[34][35][36][37][38][39][40] A computed tomography scan was performed on each specimen and, subsequently, uploaded to the neuronavigation software (GTx-Eyes II, University Health Network-University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada) in Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine format. [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43]…”
Section: Preparation Of Specimens and Neuronavigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The aim of this study is to quantitatively compare, in a preclinical setting, [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] microsurgical transcranial approaches (MTAs), endonasal endoscopic transpterygoid approach (EEA), and endoscopic transorbital approaches (ETOAs) to the SOR, using a recently developed research method, already employed for the study of surgical approaches to other skull base regions. 27,28…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%