2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.surneu.2005.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endonasal transsphenoidal surgery: the patient's perspective—survey results from 259 patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
74
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, several authors have reported on the addition of an endoscope to augment visualization of remaining tumor during microscopic resections. 12,18 In a series of 800 patients, Fatemi et al 21 examined the benefits and limitations of the microscopic endonasal approach to the sella and reported little difficulty with removal of standard microadenomas, but encountered formidable challenges when attempting to remove larger suprasellar nonadenomatous lesions. Studies report rates of GTR after microscopic transsphenoidal surgery that range from 6.9 to 90%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, several authors have reported on the addition of an endoscope to augment visualization of remaining tumor during microscopic resections. 12,18 In a series of 800 patients, Fatemi et al 21 examined the benefits and limitations of the microscopic endonasal approach to the sella and reported little difficulty with removal of standard microadenomas, but encountered formidable challenges when attempting to remove larger suprasellar nonadenomatous lesions. Studies report rates of GTR after microscopic transsphenoidal surgery that range from 6.9 to 90%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,9,16,19 Moreover, the endoscopic approach is also claimed to be associated with fewer nasal complications compared with microscopic transsphenoidal approaches. 2,19 Localized nasal complications such as obstruction and crusting have been reported in up to 38% of microscopic transsphenoidal surgeries.…”
Section: Suresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9, 16 Dusick et al 9 provided the only other quantitative assessment of the success of microscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery from the patients' perspective. They reported that by 3 months after microscopic transsphenoidal surgery, 67%-87% of patients had no rhinological complaints and concluded that rhinological recovery is rapid and relatively complete following microscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery.…”
Section: Suresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on this guideline, all of the patients in this study would have undergone surgery even though five of six patients lacked visual deterioration at initial presentation. Given the previously mentioned studies that report the resilience of the chiasm against deformation, this proposed indicator may actually engender premature exposure to surgery and the accompanying potential peri-operative complications [15][16][17] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%