2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.placenta.2017.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endoplasmic reticulum stress responses in placentation - A true balancing act

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Confirming that this is not just an in vitro effect, the placentae from women with Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome contained a substantially higher level of misfolded proteins than control placentae. Endoplasmic reticulum stress is characterized by the misfolding of proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum and a physiologic response called the unfolded protein response [37,38]. Thus, it seems that one mechanism by which antiphospholipid antibodies affect placental function is by increasing endoplasmic reticulum stress in the syncytiotrophoblast.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Confirming that this is not just an in vitro effect, the placentae from women with Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome contained a substantially higher level of misfolded proteins than control placentae. Endoplasmic reticulum stress is characterized by the misfolding of proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum and a physiologic response called the unfolded protein response [37,38]. Thus, it seems that one mechanism by which antiphospholipid antibodies affect placental function is by increasing endoplasmic reticulum stress in the syncytiotrophoblast.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ptx treatment was also shown to cause an induced prominence of PGCCs [ [13] and data not shown]. A shared pathway downstream of low oxygen tension and Ptx treatment is the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress-mediated UPR pathway [18,[37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]. We thus hypothesized that UPR activation may result in cancer cell fusion enhancement and PGCCs formation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Together, these results tend to confirm the role of UPR, probably through the activation of the three UPR sensors ATF6, IRE1α and PERK, in ovarian cancer cell-cell fusion. PERK is known to promote eIF2α phosphorylation, and thus the translation of ATF4 [review at [18]]. ATF4 is one of the transcription factor family members of cAMP response element binding (CREB) and was shown to promote expression of fusogen, syncytin 2, and thus cell fusion in a choriocarcinoma cell line [29].…”
Section: Figure 5: Ers Induction Enhances Cell Fusion In Ovarian Cancmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations