2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41433-019-0612-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: reasons for failure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
13
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A statistically significant association between the identification of granuloma formation at week 6 follow-up appointment and outcome has been found in our study (p = 0.001). Previous reports have also suggested that granuloma development around the neo-ostium might be associated with failure [21,22]. These data support the role of a regular and careful follow-up and post-operative osteotomy site debridement in the management of these patients.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…A statistically significant association between the identification of granuloma formation at week 6 follow-up appointment and outcome has been found in our study (p = 0.001). Previous reports have also suggested that granuloma development around the neo-ostium might be associated with failure [21,22]. These data support the role of a regular and careful follow-up and post-operative osteotomy site debridement in the management of these patients.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Wormald and Tsirbas demonstrated in a prospective trial that functional obstructions had lower success rates (84%) compared to anatomical obstructions (97%) [23]. Similarly to our work, other studies have compared the outcomes of functional and anatomical obstructions, but the limited number of functional diagnosis hinders drawing assertive conclusions [22]. Patients whose surgical indications were chronic or recurrent dacryocistitis showed outcomes comparable to those with epiphora only.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Patients whose surgical indications were chronic or recurrent dacryocistitis showed outcomes comparable to those with epiphora only. Other papers showed similar findings regarding surgery under the indication of repeated dacryocistitis events [22,24].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…6 In addition, when considering EN-DCR, patients with a history of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) appear to be at heightened risk for POI, even in the absence of active infection at the time of surgery. 18 This concept is supported by Shams et al who reported a rate of POI for patients without a history of CRS as 1.5% following EN-DCR compared to 15% for patients with a history of CRS. 7 Additionally, published rates of acute rhinosinusitis following ESS for CRS range between 11.9 and 20.0%, despite antibiotic prophylaxis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The management of concurrent rhinosinusitis and avoidance of scar tissue formation at the neo-ostium appear to be essential in mitigating long-term sequelae and optimizing results. 1618 A previous study of patients who underwent primary EN-DCR at our institution found that 10% ultimately require a revision procedure. 5 Furthermore, a postoperative complication, such as POI, was found to be a major predictive factor for revision (OR: 2.2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%