2020
DOI: 10.1177/1120672120942692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endoscopic endonasal balloon-dacryoplasty in failed dacryocystorhinostomy

Abstract: Objective: Endoscopic endonasal balloon-assisted dacryoplasty is a minimally-invasive surgical procedure that can be used in recurrent epiphora, a common pathology in both adulthood and childhood. Study design/Settings: We present a retrospective case series of eight patients who underwent trans-nasal balloon-assisted dacryoplasty after a failed external or endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy, from March 2019 to January 2020, at the Department of Otolaryngology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy. Subjects and M… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If a secondary re-stenosis of the neo-rhinostomy occurs, END-DCR seem to be the treatment of choice since it provides direct visualization of intranasal abnormalities which cause surgical failure, with no superiority demonstrated over EXT-DCR 28 . In addition to this, a new endoscopic approach has been proposed, based on endonasal balloon dilatation of the stenotic neorhinostomy, with encouraging data 29,30 (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Distal Lacrimal Obstructionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a secondary re-stenosis of the neo-rhinostomy occurs, END-DCR seem to be the treatment of choice since it provides direct visualization of intranasal abnormalities which cause surgical failure, with no superiority demonstrated over EXT-DCR 28 . In addition to this, a new endoscopic approach has been proposed, based on endonasal balloon dilatation of the stenotic neorhinostomy, with encouraging data 29,30 (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Distal Lacrimal Obstructionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results demonstrate that, after mean follow-up of 19.5 months and no adverse events, balloon-END-DCP provides reliable and stable outcomes with anatomical success of 100% and functional success of 85.7%, which is slightly decreased compared to our preliminary results at 6.4 months [ 19 ]. In fact, as demonstrated by Allon et al, a mean follow-up of 18 months is required to define the result as being stable for revision surgeries, since late neorhinostomy closure can occur [ 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Conversely, another revision END-DCR case-series made by Allon et al [ 17 ] presented lower success, with yearly rates, from immediate to 5 years, of 93.3%, 75.5%, 71.1%, 68.9%, 68.9%, and 68.9%, respectively. Even if dichotomous compared to the work of Ali et al, the difference noted with the latter study can be explained by the less invasiveness and bone exposure of balloon END-DCP compared to standard END-DCR, which is also demonstrated by the reduced surgical time and the possibility to perform the balloon-END-DCP in local anesthesia [ 19 ]. Another reason for the lower surgical successes of Allon et al can be explained by the long follow-up period and larger cohort size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such features improve the possibility to resolve the specific cause of DCR failure and treat concurrent pathologies, which an external approach may not provide; as a consequence, END-DCR should be preferred in case of recurrent distal lacrimal obstruction. 29,30 Following this evidence, among the failed procedures of our cohort who accepted revision surgery, all were treated with an endoscopic approach with an overall success rate of 90.6% at last follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%