2023
DOI: 10.5009/gnl230019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endoscopic Gallbladder Drainage Conversion versus Conservative Treatment Following Percutaneous Gallbladder Drainage in High-Risk Surgical Patients

Abstract: Background/Aims There are no consensus guidelines for patients with acute cholecystitis undergoing percutaneous cholecystostomy who are unfit for interval cholecystectomy. The current study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of endoscopic gallbladder drainage, i.e. conversion from percutaneous cholecystostomy (including endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder stenting and endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage), and conservative treatment after percutaneous cholecystostomy tube remova… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the procedure has demonstrated e cacy in various clinical scenarios. [2][3][4][5][6] ETGBD involves access to the gallbladder through the cystic and bile ducts, whereas EUS-GBD uses EUS guidance to create a direct transluminal route for gallbladder drainage. Both techniques have demonstrated promise in achieving successful gallbladder decompression and effectively alleviating symptoms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the procedure has demonstrated e cacy in various clinical scenarios. [2][3][4][5][6] ETGBD involves access to the gallbladder through the cystic and bile ducts, whereas EUS-GBD uses EUS guidance to create a direct transluminal route for gallbladder drainage. Both techniques have demonstrated promise in achieving successful gallbladder decompression and effectively alleviating symptoms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%