2005
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)02455-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endoscopic ligation vs. sclerotherapy in adults with extrahepatic portal venous obstruction: a prospective randomized study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
15
1
8

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
15
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Randomized trials that compared EBL to scerotherapy have yielded similar findings, without essentially having difference in the severity of bleeding between both arms. Most of these studies have reported that EBL is generally a safer technique than EIS because it involves a mechanical, less invasive method of variceal obliteration with less systemic and local complications involving the esophageal wall [7,11,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. For example our data of peritonitis were 19% with EIS versus 6.4% with EBL (p 0.01).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Randomized trials that compared EBL to scerotherapy have yielded similar findings, without essentially having difference in the severity of bleeding between both arms. Most of these studies have reported that EBL is generally a safer technique than EIS because it involves a mechanical, less invasive method of variceal obliteration with less systemic and local complications involving the esophageal wall [7,11,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. For example our data of peritonitis were 19% with EIS versus 6.4% with EBL (p 0.01).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…La ligature endoscopique à visée hémostatique a fait preuve d'une grande efficacité, et elle est actuellement considérée comme le traitement endoscopique de choix pour le traitement des varices oesophagiennes hémorragiques, elle est plus efficace que la sclérothérapie [17][18][19]. On a noté dans notre étude un taux d'hémostase à 97,1 %, mais celle-ci est rétrospective, ce qui la rend difficilement comparable aux autres études généralement prospectives et qui ont montré un taux d'hémostase variant de 86 à 100 % [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] (Tableau 3). La méta-analyse de Gross et al [28], qui a comparé les différents moyens d'hémostase (ligature, sclérose et les substances vasoactives), avait montré que la LVO était la technique la plus efficace concernant l'hémostase (91,0 % ; IC 95 % : [82,4 ± 96,3 %]).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Lo et al [29] avaient réalisé un essai randomisé et prospectif comparant la sclérose et la LVO chez 120 patients, présentant une hémorragie active des varices oesophagiennes. Cette étude avait montré que les deux techniques étaient efficaces dans l'hémostase primaire, mais la ligature était plus efficace dans la diminution de l'incidence de la récidive hémorragique par rupture des varices [21,27,29,30] avec moins de complications [20,22,27,29,31]. La ligature a été comparée à la scléro-thérapie dans 11 essais et deux méta-analyses [17,18].…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…A ligadura elástica é um procedimento mais seguro e efetivo que a escleroterapia para o tratamento das varizes esofágicas, já que os agentes esclerosantes podem causar alterações na parede do órgão e efeitos adversos na sua motilidade 3,11,14,15 . As alterações na motilidade esofágica após escleroterapia já foram estudadas por diversos autores, principalmente por meio da manometria esofágica.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…As principais alterações estão relacionadas com a morfologia, amplitude e duração das ondas contráteis. Estas alterações seriam, segundo alguns autores, secundárias a seqüelas de fibrose na parede do órgão 5,6,7,10,12,14 . Até o momento, poucos estudos foram realizados para avaliar as alterações da motilidade esofágica após ligadura elástica.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified