“…Studies including patients suffering from cervical lateral disc herniation showed clinical success rates of 96.6%-97% [6,7] and reoperation rates of 13.9% versus 18.6% [5,8]. In our study, postoperative complications occurred as 3 patients suffering from neck pain.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 45%
“…For radiculopathy caused by bony foraminal stenosis treated with endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy, the group of the authors' could show that there are high clinical success rates (90.7% according to Modified Odom's Criteria) [5]. Studies including patients suffering from cervical lateral disc herniation showed clinical success rates of 96.6%-97% [6,7] and reoperation rates of 13.9% versus 18.6% [5,8].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Oertel et al [5] included 43 patients that suffered from bony foraminal stenosis in up to 3 segments in their study. Postoperative Neck Disability Index was 18% compared to 3.33% in the group of Ye et al The group of Ye et al [12] however only included 9 patients suffering from bony foraminal stenosis in 1 segment only.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, with an endoscopic system the ray of light can be placed directly in front of the pathology and an angled optic can be used for a better illumination as well as an enlarged view on the surgical field. Furthermore, the intraoperative view on the surgical field is not obstructed by any instruments as it happens in microscopic systems [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, recent studies could show good clinical results for endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy in patients suffering from bony foraminal stenosis [5,[12][13][14]. Thus, by the time, a randomized controlled study for the microscopic vs. endoscopic technique in patients suffering from bony stenosis is still lacking.…”
Background: Posterior cervical foraminotomy is a feasible treatment option for cervical radiculopathy. In this article, we want to give a short review on the advantages, indications and limitations of this treatment procedure.
“…Studies including patients suffering from cervical lateral disc herniation showed clinical success rates of 96.6%-97% [6,7] and reoperation rates of 13.9% versus 18.6% [5,8]. In our study, postoperative complications occurred as 3 patients suffering from neck pain.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 45%
“…For radiculopathy caused by bony foraminal stenosis treated with endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy, the group of the authors' could show that there are high clinical success rates (90.7% according to Modified Odom's Criteria) [5]. Studies including patients suffering from cervical lateral disc herniation showed clinical success rates of 96.6%-97% [6,7] and reoperation rates of 13.9% versus 18.6% [5,8].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Oertel et al [5] included 43 patients that suffered from bony foraminal stenosis in up to 3 segments in their study. Postoperative Neck Disability Index was 18% compared to 3.33% in the group of Ye et al The group of Ye et al [12] however only included 9 patients suffering from bony foraminal stenosis in 1 segment only.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, with an endoscopic system the ray of light can be placed directly in front of the pathology and an angled optic can be used for a better illumination as well as an enlarged view on the surgical field. Furthermore, the intraoperative view on the surgical field is not obstructed by any instruments as it happens in microscopic systems [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, recent studies could show good clinical results for endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy in patients suffering from bony foraminal stenosis [5,[12][13][14]. Thus, by the time, a randomized controlled study for the microscopic vs. endoscopic technique in patients suffering from bony stenosis is still lacking.…”
Background: Posterior cervical foraminotomy is a feasible treatment option for cervical radiculopathy. In this article, we want to give a short review on the advantages, indications and limitations of this treatment procedure.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.