2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.04.075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation plus a novel oral 5-fluorouracil compound versus radiofrequency ablation alone for unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
56
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is nonetheless questionable whether these promising results are transferable into a real-world setting since Bismuth type III and IV PHC, severe liver dysfunction, and systemic chemotherapy were exclusion criteria. Interestingly, the same group recently published a prospective RCT [35] that evaluated the clinical efficacy and safety of intraductal RFA in combination ( n = 37) with a novel oral 5-fluorouracil compound (S-1) versus intraductal RFA alone ( n = 38) for the treatment of unresectable locally advanced eCCA (70% distal CCA). While the incidence of ERCP-related adverse events did not differ significantly, the median overall survival (16 vs. 11 months, p < 0.001) as well as the stent patency time (6.6 vs. 5.6 months, p = 0.014) was significantly longer in the combination group.…”
Section: Efficacy and Safety Of Intraductal Rfa For Phcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is nonetheless questionable whether these promising results are transferable into a real-world setting since Bismuth type III and IV PHC, severe liver dysfunction, and systemic chemotherapy were exclusion criteria. Interestingly, the same group recently published a prospective RCT [35] that evaluated the clinical efficacy and safety of intraductal RFA in combination ( n = 37) with a novel oral 5-fluorouracil compound (S-1) versus intraductal RFA alone ( n = 38) for the treatment of unresectable locally advanced eCCA (70% distal CCA). While the incidence of ERCP-related adverse events did not differ significantly, the median overall survival (16 vs. 11 months, p < 0.001) as well as the stent patency time (6.6 vs. 5.6 months, p = 0.014) was significantly longer in the combination group.…”
Section: Efficacy and Safety Of Intraductal Rfa For Phcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past decade, many studies have validated the technical safety and effectiveness of ID-RFA (Table 1). [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] Most studies used the Habib RFA catheter, and various biliary stents were placed to maintain biliary drainage after ID-RFA. Alis et al 24 reported that endobiliary RFA therapy is feasible and safe for palliative treatment of distal and bismuth type I hilar extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.…”
Section: Clinical Efficacy Of Id-rfamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the local effect of ID-RFA, an enhanced therapeutic outcome can be anticipated when ID-RFA is combined with anticancer treatment, which is the current standard treatment for biliary cancer. A prospective randomised controlled study 32 reported that ID-RFA combined with S-1 for locally advanced extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma was associated with longer survival and stent patency and improved functional status than RFA alone (16.0 months vs 11.0 months; P < 0.001 and 6.6 ± 1.5 months vs 5.6 ± 0.1 months; P = 0.014, respectively). Although S-1 is not the primary choice of anticancer agent for biliary tract cancer, it is necessary to evaluate the combined effects of various systemic anticancer therapies to improve the therapeutic outcomes of ID-RFA.…”
Section: Perihilar Application and Combination Therapy Of Id-rfamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 These milestones must be achieved before embarking upon a multidisciplinary approach to treatment. 7 Yang et al 8 compared mortality and other outcomes in a randomized trial of ERCP-guided intraductal radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with (n Z 37) and without (n Z 38) the use of a novel fluorouracil compound (S-1) for patients with unresectable extrahepatic CCA. Because all patients underwent intraductal RFA, the independent variable was the use of S-1.…”
Section: Editorialmentioning
confidence: 99%