Abstract:Background
In 2018, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) replaced a fixed 50 mg every 4-week maintenance regimen of golimumab for ulcerative colitis (UC) patients weighing <80 kg with new, flexible dosing that allows reactive dose optimization to 100 mg if clinically needed. We analyzed the endoscopic remission rates and pharmacokinetics of this new dosing regimen in real-life settings.
Methods
We prospectively recruited 30 consecutive (17 with body w… Show more
“…14 Real-world data remain important to assess performance of a drug under non-ideal conditions in clinical practice, when treatment cannot be limited to patients fulfilling narrow inclusion criteria, 15 with only about one in four real-life UC patients qualifying for participation in randomized controlled trials. 16 Some real-world data and post-marketing studies for golimumab in UC are available, 14,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] these generally confirmed effectiveness and safety of golimumab treatment. In some of these studies, clinical response and remission, 18,22,23,25 and persistence rates, 17 were higher in anti-TNF naïve patients compared with non-naïve patients.…”
Section: Effectiveness Of Golimumab In Patients With Ulcerative Colit...mentioning
Background: Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors have improved treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC), but loss of response remains a frequent problem. The anti-TNF agent, golimumab, was approved in Switzerland for the treatment of UC in 2014. This study aims to summarize the experience of golimumab in a real-world setting in Switzerland. Methods: We analyzed real-world data from 1769 UC patients from the Swiss Inflammatory Bowel Disease Cohort (SIBDC) study and performed a chart review of golimumab-treated patients. We extracted the partial Mayo score at t0 (baseline), t1 (2–16 weeks), t2 (17–35 weeks), and t3 (36–89 weeks). The primary endpoint was clinical response at t1, defined as marked improvement in partial Mayo score and objective parameters. Clinical remission was defined as resolution of symptoms and normalization of objective parameters. Results: Our chart review included 103 UC patients with golimumab treatment (5.8% of all SIBDC UC patients); only 16 (15.5%) were anti-TNF naïve. Sixty-three patients remained on golimumab (61.2%) after 180 days, 51 (44.7%) after 365 days, and 34 (33%) after 630 days after the start of treatment. Upon golimumab treatment, the partial Mayo score decreased from 4 [interquartile range (IQR): 2–6] at t0 to 2 (IQR: 0–4) at t1, 1 (IQR: 0–3.5) at t2, and 1 (IQR: 0–3) at t3 ( p < 0.001 for all comparisons with t0). The primary endpoint, clinical response at t1, could be evaluated in 52 patients and was met in 15 individuals (28.8%). Clinical remission at t1 was observed in 8 out of 52 patients (15.4%). Golimumab was generally well tolerated, one patient developed meningitis. The most frequent reasons to stop treatment were primary and secondary non-response. Conclusion: Golimumab was used in 5.8% of Swiss UC patients, mainly in biologic-experienced individuals. Golimumab treatment was associated with a sustained reduction of symptoms and clinical response in approximately 30% of patients. [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00488631]
“…14 Real-world data remain important to assess performance of a drug under non-ideal conditions in clinical practice, when treatment cannot be limited to patients fulfilling narrow inclusion criteria, 15 with only about one in four real-life UC patients qualifying for participation in randomized controlled trials. 16 Some real-world data and post-marketing studies for golimumab in UC are available, 14,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] these generally confirmed effectiveness and safety of golimumab treatment. In some of these studies, clinical response and remission, 18,22,23,25 and persistence rates, 17 were higher in anti-TNF naïve patients compared with non-naïve patients.…”
Section: Effectiveness Of Golimumab In Patients With Ulcerative Colit...mentioning
Background: Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors have improved treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC), but loss of response remains a frequent problem. The anti-TNF agent, golimumab, was approved in Switzerland for the treatment of UC in 2014. This study aims to summarize the experience of golimumab in a real-world setting in Switzerland. Methods: We analyzed real-world data from 1769 UC patients from the Swiss Inflammatory Bowel Disease Cohort (SIBDC) study and performed a chart review of golimumab-treated patients. We extracted the partial Mayo score at t0 (baseline), t1 (2–16 weeks), t2 (17–35 weeks), and t3 (36–89 weeks). The primary endpoint was clinical response at t1, defined as marked improvement in partial Mayo score and objective parameters. Clinical remission was defined as resolution of symptoms and normalization of objective parameters. Results: Our chart review included 103 UC patients with golimumab treatment (5.8% of all SIBDC UC patients); only 16 (15.5%) were anti-TNF naïve. Sixty-three patients remained on golimumab (61.2%) after 180 days, 51 (44.7%) after 365 days, and 34 (33%) after 630 days after the start of treatment. Upon golimumab treatment, the partial Mayo score decreased from 4 [interquartile range (IQR): 2–6] at t0 to 2 (IQR: 0–4) at t1, 1 (IQR: 0–3.5) at t2, and 1 (IQR: 0–3) at t3 ( p < 0.001 for all comparisons with t0). The primary endpoint, clinical response at t1, could be evaluated in 52 patients and was met in 15 individuals (28.8%). Clinical remission at t1 was observed in 8 out of 52 patients (15.4%). Golimumab was generally well tolerated, one patient developed meningitis. The most frequent reasons to stop treatment were primary and secondary non-response. Conclusion: Golimumab was used in 5.8% of Swiss UC patients, mainly in biologic-experienced individuals. Golimumab treatment was associated with a sustained reduction of symptoms and clinical response in approximately 30% of patients. [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00488631]
Background
Currently approved biologic therapies for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis have well-established efficacy. However, many patients fail to respond or lose response, leading to dose escalation or treatment switching.
Objective
We sought to identify real-world evidence on dose escalation and treatment switching and associated clinical and economic outcomes among adults with ulcerative colitis treated with infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, vedolizumab, ustekinumab, or tofacitinib.
Methods
We conducted a systematic search of Embase, MEDLINE (up to 26 August 2020), and conference proceedings (2017−2020) for studies in adults with ulcerative colitis to assess clinical response and remission, colectomy, adverse events, and economic outcomes related to dose escalation and treatment switching.
Results
In 56 studies, dose escalation and treatment switching involving infliximab and/or adalimumab were most frequently investigated. Rates of clinical response after dose escalation were 20–95% (1.8–36 months), clinical remission rates were 10–94% (1.8–36 months), colectomy rates were 0–33% (12–38 months), and adverse event rates were 0–18%. Treatment switching rates in 21 studies were 4–70% over 3–62 months, with switch due to loss of response rates of 4–35% over 12–62 months (7 studies). Up to 35% of patients underwent colectomy 12−120 weeks after switching, and 13–38% experienced adverse events. Data relating to economic outcomes were limited to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, but demonstrated increased direct costs associated with both dose escalation and treatment switching.
Conclusion
Dose escalation and treatment switching are common with existing therapies. However, clinical response and remission rates vary, and a proportion of patients fail to achieve optimal clinical and economic outcomes. This highlights the need for more efficacious and durable treatments for patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis.
“…1,2 However, there are only limited data regarding golimumab and the ideal drug concentration threshold to target when applying TDM in clinical practice. [3][4][5][6][7] Taxonera et al performed a multicenter, cross-sectional, cohort study in 52 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) treated with golimumab and found positive associations between maintenance golimumab trough concentrations (GTCs) with several stringent sole and composite outcomes, such as clinical remission (Partial Mayo Score…”
Section: N V I T E D E D I T O R I a Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are in line with previous studies showing that higher golimumab concentrations are associated with higher rates of favourable therapeutic outcomes. [3][4][5][6][7] A post hoc analysis of the phase 2/3 PURSUIT randomised controlled trials (RCTs) identified golimumab concentrations thresholds of 0.9 μg/ml at week 28 and 1.4 μg/ml at week 44 with clinical remission at week 54. 4 This study has several inherent limitations.…”
Section: N V I T E D E D I T O R I a Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has emerged as a useful monitoring tool for optimising anti‐TNF therapy, especially infliximab and adalimumab 1,2 . However, there are only limited data regarding golimumab and the ideal drug concentration threshold to target when applying TDM in clinical practice 3–7 …”
LINKED CONTENTThis article is linked to Taxonera et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.16964 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17118
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.