Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Practice 2011
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-7020-3128-1.00010-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, by covering supplementary endoscopic characteristics of the papilla, we needed to consider the limitation of using a non-validated classification. However, suggestions for such classifications were made within several publications [ 10 , 17 ]. While using an interobserver- and intraobserver-validated classification proves useful and relevant in an everyday clinical setting [ 15 , 16 ], adding up to such classification would not provide less generalizable results within a single center prospective cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nevertheless, by covering supplementary endoscopic characteristics of the papilla, we needed to consider the limitation of using a non-validated classification. However, suggestions for such classifications were made within several publications [ 10 , 17 ]. While using an interobserver- and intraobserver-validated classification proves useful and relevant in an everyday clinical setting [ 15 , 16 ], adding up to such classification would not provide less generalizable results within a single center prospective cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its appearance was classified in either regular anatomy or one of the four anatomical variations. The classification expansion used within the study was based on a former definition of the papillary anatomical variations previously published by Canard et al in 2011 [17]. By adapting the former description of anatomical variants, we obtained an objective and reproducible classification add-on suitable for our study design.…”
Section: Classification Of Papillary Morphology and Procedures Documenmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By comparing our study to the above mentioned studies we can estimate a wide variability in the accuracy of different diagnostic modalities especially EUS and MRCP for diagnosing biliary diseases, and this may indicate multiple factors contributing to such difference, including level of expertise in performing EUS, Un availability of specific guidelines for a better patient stratification and a time lapse between different studies, in addition to the sample size as mentioned before. One of the important factor which should be taken in to consideration is a spontaneous passage of gallstones in a period between performing EUS and ERCP, this is supported by a study done by Frossard et al [23], which reported that spontaneous passage of stones occurred at a rate of 20% per a week, especially if a stone very small (<5 mm) [24] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…After localizing the MDP in the duodenum with the side-viewing endoscope, different instruments and techniques are used to cannulate the common bile duct (CBD) and/or pancreatic duct (PD). A contrast agent is injected to opacify the biliary system and/or the pancreatic duct, allowing radiologic visualization, diagnosis and different therapeutic interventions (Canard, Lennon, Létard, Etienne, & Okolo, 2011). Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) technique is regarded as a complex and advanced endoscopic procedure because of its need for a variety of instruments and accessories as well as its long learning curve which is needed to develop competency with this technique.…”
Section: Historical Background and Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%