2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.03.317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endoscopic Stenting Versus Surgical Gastrojejunostomy for Palliation of Malignat Gastroduodenal Obstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These advantages were confirmed in studies presented this year, including a nonrandomized (unfortunately) comparison of SEMS and surgical treatment and two prospec− tive, single−arm, multicenter studies on a new nitinol enteral stent. [19]. Stents were placed successfully in 39 of 40 patients (97 %) and gastrojejunostomy was performed in the remaining 40 patients.…”
Section: Stents For Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstructionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These advantages were confirmed in studies presented this year, including a nonrandomized (unfortunately) comparison of SEMS and surgical treatment and two prospec− tive, single−arm, multicenter studies on a new nitinol enteral stent. [19]. Stents were placed successfully in 39 of 40 patients (97 %) and gastrojejunostomy was performed in the remaining 40 patients.…”
Section: Stents For Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstructionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Stepwise 19), complete clearance of intestinal metaplasia and dyspla− sia was achieved in 0 % and 21 % of patients, respectively (inten− tion−to−treat analysis, differences were significant). None of the patients treated with RFA had progression of dysplasia, while three in the sham group progressed.…”
Section: Endoscopic Treatment Of Barrett's Dysplasia and Cancermentioning
confidence: 98%