2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-007-9375-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endoscopic Thyroidectomy by the Breast Approach: A Single Institution’s 9‐year Experience

Abstract: Endoscopic thyroidectomy by the breast approach for patients with thyroid diseases is an effective procedure that allows an excellent cosmetic result.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
81
3
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
81
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, the superior parathyroid gland was often easier to identify and dissect from the thyroid gland on a vascular pedicle than in open thyroidectomy. We experienced a lower incidence of transient hypocalcemia in the ET group than previous reports (22)(23)(24) (Table III). All patients with transient hypocalcemia recovered within 1 month.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…In the present study, the superior parathyroid gland was often easier to identify and dissect from the thyroid gland on a vascular pedicle than in open thyroidectomy. We experienced a lower incidence of transient hypocalcemia in the ET group than previous reports (22)(23)(24) (Table III). All patients with transient hypocalcemia recovered within 1 month.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…Although patients who underwent ETBA-m had significantly less postoperative pain than those who underwent sETBA 12 and 24 h postoperatively, one cannot rationally conclude that ETBA-m is superior, as personal bias may be involved (26). However, ETBA-m has the potential to reduce invasiveness in terms of total incision length (2.66 ± 0.09 cm vs. 2.08 ± 0.24 cm, p < 0.001) and the lack of a parasternal incision (the triangle-shaped area between the nipples does not need to be dissected, reducing the area of subcutaneous dissection; 136.25 ± 19.22 cm 2 vs.105.25 ± 9.54 cm 2 , p < 0.001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This difference in volumes approached significance (p = 0.08), clearly indicating that the size of the enlarged thyroid gland is an essential factor in determining the surgical approach. Several studies have documented increased operative times and blood loss in patients who had a minimally invasive surgery for larger thyroid volumes [12,15,19]. Thus, we propose that patients with GD who have smaller glands could potentially undergo robotic surgeries, while those with larger glands or substernal goiters should be offered a cervical incision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%