2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endoscopic transnasal approach and intraoperative navigation for the treatment of isolated blowout fractures of the medial orbital wall

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Major reported drawback is the difficulty in managing the reconstruction phase. [4] Complications such as infection of the surgical site or sinusitis caused by the obstruction of the sinus ostium can be avoided by a careful insertion of a silastic sheet, the early removal of nasal tampons, and the administration of antibiotics. [17]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Major reported drawback is the difficulty in managing the reconstruction phase. [4] Complications such as infection of the surgical site or sinusitis caused by the obstruction of the sinus ostium can be avoided by a careful insertion of a silastic sheet, the early removal of nasal tampons, and the administration of antibiotics. [17]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nasal packing can be managed in different ways: from the removal of the day after the intervention to the removal of 3 or 4 weeks under local anesthesia[421] and till no needs of secondary procedures in case of use of absorbable packing materials. [22]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Other authors have proposed their case series of transnasal management of medial wall fractures with (Copelli and colleagues) or without (Pagnoni and colleagues) the aid of navigation. These authors, however, did not reconstruct the bony wall and relied upon long‐term nasal packing (2–3 weeks) to obtain the desired correction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%