2020
DOI: 10.1136/bmjgast-2020-000408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and the management of pancreatic cancer

Abstract: Pancreatic cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality in western countries. Early diagnosis of pancreatic cancers plays a key role in the management by identification of patients who are surgical candidates. The advancement in the radiological imaging and interventional endoscopy (including endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic enteral stenting techniques) has a significant impact in the diagnostic evaluation, staging and treatment of pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to variation in the size, depth, and location of pancreatic tumors, simulations with varying applicator geometries incorporating different patient anatomy models illustrated the feasibility of delivering hyperthermia across different tumor sizes and positions in the pancreas. As reported in the literature for endoscopic ultrasound imaging [56][57][58] and confirmed in this study, the tumors in the body and tail of the pancreas can be accessed from the body of the stomach, whereas manipulating the stomach wall and positioning the applicator toward the pylorus would provide access to regions within the head of the pancreas. By selection of device balloon diameter and careful consideration of the applicator dimensions and frequency, depth of treatment from the luminal wall as well as dimensions of the therapeutic zone encompassing an effective margin around the tumor can be estimated a priori.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Due to variation in the size, depth, and location of pancreatic tumors, simulations with varying applicator geometries incorporating different patient anatomy models illustrated the feasibility of delivering hyperthermia across different tumor sizes and positions in the pancreas. As reported in the literature for endoscopic ultrasound imaging [56][57][58] and confirmed in this study, the tumors in the body and tail of the pancreas can be accessed from the body of the stomach, whereas manipulating the stomach wall and positioning the applicator toward the pylorus would provide access to regions within the head of the pancreas. By selection of device balloon diameter and careful consideration of the applicator dimensions and frequency, depth of treatment from the luminal wall as well as dimensions of the therapeutic zone encompassing an effective margin around the tumor can be estimated a priori.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…While MRI is not as widely used as CT for initial diagnosis, it is more efficient in detecting small tumors, metastatic lesions in liver peritoneum and lymph nodes (LN), and identifying malignant cystic lesions of the pancreas 175 , 176 . Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is highly sensitive in detecting small tumors that are often missed by other imaging modalities, and it also provides an opportunity to collect samples (fine needle aspirates) for cytological or biomarker analysis to facilitate the most conclusive diagnosis 177 . Metabolic PET imaging, which relies on the differential uptake of 18 F-labeled fluoro-deoxy glucose (FDG) by rapidly growing tumor cells, enables whole-body imaging to detect both primary tumors and metastasis and is used alone or in combination with CT and MRI for evaluating the response to therapy in PDAC patients 178 , 179 .…”
Section: Nanocarrier-based Delivery Of Therapeutic Imaging and Theran...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is a sensitive method for identification of small lesions of the pancreas which can be subsequently focused for fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB). EUS is more sensitive than CT, especially for small lesions ( 2 cm) and it is also most reliable in evaluation of infiltration of large visceral vessels and lymph node involvement [28].…”
Section: Screening and Diagnostics Of Pcmentioning
confidence: 99%