2023
DOI: 10.3390/cancers15020490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Biliary Drainage in Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction

Abstract: Malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) is a challenging medical problem that often negatively impacts the patient’s quality of life (QoL), postoperative complications, and survival rates. Endoscopic approaches to biliary drainage are generally performed by ERCP or, in selected cases, with a percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD). Recent advances in therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) allow drainage where previous methods have failed. EUS has evolved from a purely diagnostic technique to one that al… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We utilized a different LAMS, the Hot-Spaxus stent, which has been reported to have a high technical performance in EUS-GBD. [17][18][19][20][21] As in the previous studies, technical success was achieved in all patients, demonstrating GBD in this setting to be a very safe procedure, mostly ensured by skills previously acquired by endosonographers in the context of acute cholecystitis in high-risk surgical patients. Moreover, in the clinical scenario of the present study the GB is usually distended by the presence of DMBO and without inflammatory changes, such as thickened GB walls or peri-GB fluid/collection, thus making the drainage procedure easier than in the acute setting.…”
Section: Follow-upsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We utilized a different LAMS, the Hot-Spaxus stent, which has been reported to have a high technical performance in EUS-GBD. [17][18][19][20][21] As in the previous studies, technical success was achieved in all patients, demonstrating GBD in this setting to be a very safe procedure, mostly ensured by skills previously acquired by endosonographers in the context of acute cholecystitis in high-risk surgical patients. Moreover, in the clinical scenario of the present study the GB is usually distended by the presence of DMBO and without inflammatory changes, such as thickened GB walls or peri-GB fluid/collection, thus making the drainage procedure easier than in the acute setting.…”
Section: Follow-upsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The cystic duct had to be patent on CT/MRI, which was subsequently rechecked during EUS done to perform EUS‐GBD that resulted in exclusion of three additional patients, leading to a total of 37 patients evaluated. We utilized a different LAMS, the Hot‐Spaxus stent, which has been reported to have a high technical performance in EUS‐GBD 17–21 . As in the previous studies, technical success was achieved in all patients, demonstrating GBD in this setting to be a very safe procedure, mostly ensured by skills previously acquired by endosonographers in the context of acute cholecystitis in high‐risk surgical patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Even if ERCP is the therapeutic option of choice in non-surgical patients, EUS-BD can be an option when ERCP is not feasible [ 83 ]. EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has been used for unresectable CCA with a technical and clinical success rate of over 90% and over 70%, respectively [ 82 ].…”
Section: Endoscopic Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LAMS represents a new type of fully covered self-expandable metal stent which is mounted using a delivery system with an electrocautery distal tip, which facilitates the direct access to the biliary system [ 85 , 86 ]. The technique was first described in 2001 by Giovannini [ 83 ].…”
Section: Endoscopic Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EUS-BD technique includes transluminal (TL) biliary stent placement, EUS-guided antegrade transpapillary (or transanastomotic) stenting, and EUS-guided rendezvous (RV) approach [3][4][5]. Though the RV method can provide a physiologic anatomic pathway for drainage, it may fail due to inaccessible papilla or failure to advance guidewire through the stricture [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%