2017
DOI: 10.1177/2050640616684697
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endoscopic ultrasound in gastric cancer staging before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A comparison with PET‐CT in a clinical series

Abstract: EUS performed better than PET-CT in gastric cancer N staging and restaging. EUS accuracy in this setting is still suboptimal and probably more than one single diagnostic procedure should be used.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(71 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies have been conducted with evaluating the accuracy of EUS in gastric cancer staging and some of them have reported that EUS is useful in determining the invasion depth (T stage) with an accuracy higher than 90%. EUS performance for N stage evaluation seems to be less effective than T stage evaluation, although previous studies have shown excellent accuracy of nodal stage evaluation by EUS 13–27 . These data suggest that EUS is an excellent adjunct to standard staging modalities in gastric cancer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Many studies have been conducted with evaluating the accuracy of EUS in gastric cancer staging and some of them have reported that EUS is useful in determining the invasion depth (T stage) with an accuracy higher than 90%. EUS performance for N stage evaluation seems to be less effective than T stage evaluation, although previous studies have shown excellent accuracy of nodal stage evaluation by EUS 13–27 . These data suggest that EUS is an excellent adjunct to standard staging modalities in gastric cancer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…3 Nonetheless there is great heterogeneity in the accuracy rates of T and N stages, with reports ranging between 60-90% for T stage and 50-90% for N stage. 3,[11][12][13]15,17,[19][20][24][25][26][27] In contrast with previous studies focusing on T and N stage evaluation separately, we have evaluated T and N in combination in this study, focusing on the distinction between T1N0 and T ! 2 and/or Nþ tumours, which is more clinically applicable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 35 With the development of endoscopic technology, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has received increasing attention. Redondo et al 36 believe that EUS has advantages over CT and positron emission tomography, especially in T1-T2 stage.…”
Section: Efficacy Prediction and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the most cited studies in this field, data about further interventions depending on EUS findings, or long-term follow ups for relapse detection, are lacking [14,15]. Furthermore, echoendoscope image quality has significantly improved and, in more recent studies, it has shown better results than in earlier series [16]. Moreover, new criteria for chronic pancreatitis have been developed [17], so that the current diagnostic yield of EUS in the evaluation of IAP may have improved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%