Endoscopic versus conventional septoplasty: objective/subjective data on 276 patients

Garzaro, Massimiliano; Dell’Era, Valeria; Riva, Giuseppe; Raimondo, Luca; Pecorari, Giancarlo; Valletti, Paolo Aluffi

doi:10.1007/s00405-019-05393-w

Cited by 18 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…1 Complications include nasal crusting, persistent deviation, infection/septal abscess, septal perforation, septal hematoma, and external deformity. 2 Multiple modalities have been implemented for a successful outcome. In the era of the quilting suture, variability exists as to the use of nasal packing and splints.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The efficacy of silastic sheet nasal splints in endoscopic nasal septal repair surgery: a prospective, randomized, single‐blinded controlled trial

Al-Asousi

Fan

Pascual

et al. 2021

Int Forum Allergy Rhinol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The efficacy of silastic sheet nasal splints in endoscopic nasal septal repair surgery: a prospective, randomized, single‐blinded controlled trial

Al-Asousi

Fan

Pascual

et al. 2021

Int Forum Allergy Rhinol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Significantly higher rate of persistence of symptoms was found with conventional septoplasty as compared to endoscopic septoplasty in a study by Nayak et al 8 Synechiae was less common in the endoscopic group as compared to the conventional group in several studies. 16,[19][20][21][22] However in our study, one patient each in both groups had postoperative synechiae, for which no intervention was required as it remained asymptomatic. None of the patient developed septal perforation.…”

Section: Harley Et Al Observed Significant Improvement In Patientsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Outcomes of Conventional Septoplasty Versus Endoscopic Septoplasty using Freer’s Incision in Symptomatic Deviated Nasal Septum

Khadgi

Gurung

Pradhan

et al. 2021

Kathmandu Univ. Med. J.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Septoplasty techniques have evolved over the years with endoscopic septoplasty gaining popularity in the recent times. Objective To compare the outcomes of conventional septoplasty with endoscopic septoplasty using Freer’s incision in symptomatic deviated nasal septum. Method It was a prospective, randomized and comparative study done at Department of ENT Head and Neck Surgery, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal from July 2018 to August 2019. A total of 70 patients with symptomatic deviated nasal septum were allocated randomly into two groups. Group A underwent conventional septoplasty whilst Group B underwent endoscopic septoplasty using Freer’s incision. Sino-nasal outcome test (SNOT-10) score was recorded pre-operatively and post -operatively between four to six weeks of surgery. Paired and independent ‘t’ test for mean was used as a statistical tool. Result Out of 70 patients, 57(81.43%) were males and 13(18.57%) females. The age group mostly affected was in the third and fourth decades with total 47 patients (67.14%). In the conventional group, the pre-op mean SNOT-10 score was 11.46 (SD±3.6) while post-op mean SNOT-10 score was 2.60 (SD±1.9), the difference being statistically significant (p value 0.00001). Similarly, in the endoscopic group, pre-op mean SNOT-10 score was 12.06 (SD±4.88) and post-op mean SNOT-10 score was 3.37 (SD±2.71) with the difference being statistically significant (p value 0.00001). Comparison of post-operative mean SNOT-10 score between two techniques was not statistically significant (p value 0.17). Conclusion Both conventional and endoscopic septoplasty techniques using Freer’s incision were equally effective in improving symptoms due to deviated nasal septum.

show abstract

“…Rossiiskaya otorinolaringologiya литературных данных не было найдено достаточно достоверных исследований о функциональном состоянии слизистой оболочки полости носа после хирургических вмешательств, в частности динамического изменения морфофункциональных наблюдений в раннем и отдаленном послеоперационных периодах [12,[14][15][16].…”

Section: ;19;3(106)unclassified

Functional state of the nasal cavity after endoscopic septoplasty

Karpishchenko¹,

Aleksandrov²,

Shakhnazarov³

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Septoplasty is one of the three most frequently performed operations in otorhinolaryngology. The history of the development has more than 200 years. The research and analysis of the features of different methods of this surgical treatment does not lose interest to this day. The article presents an analysis of the restoration of the functions of the nasal cavity after septoplasty. The research included 96 patients with various types of nasal septum deformities. The age range of patients ranged from 19 to 54 years. All patients had nasal septum correction under general anesthesia. Patients were divided into 2 groups. The 1st group included 64 patients who had endoscopic septoplasty. The 2nd control group consisted of 43 patients with the same pathology who underwent classical septoplasty without optical control. Dynamic observation was carried out before surgical treatment, on the 7th day, 1, 3, 6, 12 months after surgery. The aim of the research was to estimate the functional status of the mucous membrane of the nasal cavity after surgery, the time of the operation, as well as long-term postoperative complications if any. The following diagnostic measures there were: complaints, otorhinolaryngological examination by using endoscopic techniques, anterior active rhinomanometry on the Rinolan device (manufactured by Lana-Medica), measurement of mucociliary transport time using the saccharin test. Comparative analysis of groups of patients showed no significant difference in the restoration of nasal cavity functions. However, performing septoplasty using endoscopic technique reduces the time of surgery and the percentage of complications in contrast to the classical septum surgery

show abstract

Endoscopic versus conventional septoplasty: objective/subjective data on 276 patients

Cited by 18 publications

References 22 publications

The efficacy of silastic sheet nasal splints in endoscopic nasal septal repair surgery: a prospective, randomized, single‐blinded controlled trial

The efficacy of silastic sheet nasal splints in endoscopic nasal septal repair surgery: a prospective, randomized, single‐blinded controlled trial

Comparison of Outcomes of Conventional Septoplasty Versus Endoscopic Septoplasty using Freer’s Incision in Symptomatic Deviated Nasal Septum

Functional state of the nasal cavity after endoscopic septoplasty

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About