2022
DOI: 10.1002/art.42094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endothelial Cell–Activating Antibodies in COVID‐19

Abstract: Objective While endothelial dysfunction has been implicated in the widespread thrombo‐inflammatory complications of coronavirus disease‐19 ( COVID‐19 ), the upstream mediators of endotheliopathy remain for the most part cryptic. Our aim was to identify circulating factors contributing to endothelial cell activation and dysfunction in COVID‐19. Methods Human endothelial cells were cultured in the presence of serum or plasma from 244 patients ho… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
41
3
4

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
41
3
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with these findings, we found that incubation of endothelial cells with COVID-19 patient plasma containing a mixture of cytokines including IFNa, adipokines and other mediators did not alter ACE2 expression and also not result in endothelial activation. In contrast to our findings, a recent study by Shi et al using serum from a large cohort of COVID-19 patients found that the surface expression of E-selectin, VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 were around 2, 4 and 3-fold increase in HUVEC compared to control serum (40). However, the response of the serum on endothelial cells was very heterogenic with a large sub-population of patient samples not inducing endothelial activation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In line with these findings, we found that incubation of endothelial cells with COVID-19 patient plasma containing a mixture of cytokines including IFNa, adipokines and other mediators did not alter ACE2 expression and also not result in endothelial activation. In contrast to our findings, a recent study by Shi et al using serum from a large cohort of COVID-19 patients found that the surface expression of E-selectin, VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 were around 2, 4 and 3-fold increase in HUVEC compared to control serum (40). However, the response of the serum on endothelial cells was very heterogenic with a large sub-population of patient samples not inducing endothelial activation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to our findings, a recent study by Shi et al. using serum from a large cohort of COVID-19 patients found that the surface expression of E-selectin, VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 were around 2, 4 and 3-fold increase in HUVEC compared to control serum ( 40 ). However, the response of the serum on endothelial cells was very heterogenic with a large sub-population of patient samples not inducing endothelial activation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, injection of IgG purified from COVID-19 patients accelerated venous thrombosis in two mouse models ( 15 ). Recently, the same group found that serum samples from COVID-19 hospitalised patients were able to activate endothelial cells compared with those of sepsis patients and healthy controls ( 22 ). Interestingly, aCL and aPS/PT from COVID-19 patients strongly correlated with markers of endothelial cell activation and modestly with those of NETs/thrombo-inflammation including C-reactive protein, D-dimer and calprotectin ( 22 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 11 Recent data have also suggested that some patients with severe COVID-19 may develop diverse autoantibodies that activate the endothelium, driving endotheliopathy and thrombo-inflammatory effects. 12 According to this theory, it is possible that discontinuation of IV steroids after 8 days of treatment may have allowed the inflammatory process to rebound, leading to endothelial reactivation and recurrent thrombi formation. Interestingly, the tPA therapy did not help improve respiratory function in the long run, as shown in a case series by Wang et al 13 Furthermore, data have shown that the use of anti-IL-6 therapy has risks of secondary bacterial and viral infections, delayed viral clearance, and reinfection from the COVID-19 virus, 14 but, in the above clinical setting, we decided to go for the anti-IL-6 therapy for the second time to control the inflammatory surge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%