ObjectiveTo evaluate the usefulness and prognostic value of reactive hyperemia -
peripheral arterial tonometry in patients with sepsis. Moreover, we
investigated the association of reactive hyperemia - peripheral arterial
tonometry results with serum levels of certain inflammatory molecules.MethodsProspective study, conducted in an 18-bed mixed intensive care unit for
adults. The exclusion criteria included severe immunosuppression or
antibiotic therapy initiated more than 48 hours before assessment. We
measured the reactive hyperemia - peripheral arterial tonometry on inclusion
(day 1) and on day 3. Interleukin-6, interleukin-10, high-mobility group box
1 protein and soluble ST2 levels were measured in the blood obtained upon
inclusion.ResultsSeventeen of the 79 patients (21.6%) enrolled were determined to have
reactive hyperemia - peripheral arterial tonometry signals considered
technically unreliable and were excluded from the study. Thus, 62 patients
were included in the final analysis, and they underwent a total of 95
reactive hyperemia - peripheral arterial tonometry exams within the first 48
hours after inclusion. The mean age was 51.5 (SD: 18.9), and 49 (62%) of the
patients were male. Reactive hyperemia indexes from days 1 and 3 were not
associated with vasopressor need, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score,
Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, or 28-day
mortality. Among the patients who died, compared with survivors, there was a
significant increase in the day 3 reactive hyperemia index compared with day
1 (p = 0.045). There was a weak negative correlation between the day 1
reactive hyperemia - peripheral arterial tonometry index and the levels of
high-mobility group box 1 protein (r = -0.287).ConclusionTechnical difficulties and the lack of clear associations between the exam
results and clinical severity or outcomes strongly limits the utility of
reactive hyperemia - peripheral arterial tonometry in septic patients
admitted to the intensive care unit.