2019
DOI: 10.2991/chi.d.190317.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endothelial Dysfunction in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Abstract: The goal of this review is to look at the role of endothelial damage and dysfunction in the initiation and development of early complications that appear after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). These early complications share overlapping clinical manifestations and the suspicion of underlying endothelial damage. Several studies using different approaches, such as animal and in vitro models, the analysis of soluble biomarkers and clinical findings have provided evidence of this endothelial dysfunction. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Biomarkers could be either: (a) diagnostic biomarker (that identifies patients at the onset of clinical disease); (b) prognostic (that identifies the likelihood of a clinical event occurrence in HCT recipients), or (c) predictive (that categorizes patients by their likelihood of response to a particular treatment when measured prior to the treatment) [ 2 ]. Since GVHD and RRTs share a common trigger, particularly damaged endothelium [ 5 ], circulating endothelial cells (CECs) have been evaluated as a diagnostic biomarker for SOS [ 6 ] and as a prognostic marker for endothelial damage [ 7 10 ], acute GVHD [ 7 , 11 ], and thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) [ 12 ]. Similarly, regulatory T cells (Tregs) [ 13 ], CD146 + T cells [ 14 ] and invariant natural killer T cells [ 15 ] have been evaluated as diagnostic/prognostic biomarkers for acute GVHD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biomarkers could be either: (a) diagnostic biomarker (that identifies patients at the onset of clinical disease); (b) prognostic (that identifies the likelihood of a clinical event occurrence in HCT recipients), or (c) predictive (that categorizes patients by their likelihood of response to a particular treatment when measured prior to the treatment) [ 2 ]. Since GVHD and RRTs share a common trigger, particularly damaged endothelium [ 5 ], circulating endothelial cells (CECs) have been evaluated as a diagnostic biomarker for SOS [ 6 ] and as a prognostic marker for endothelial damage [ 7 10 ], acute GVHD [ 7 , 11 ], and thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) [ 12 ]. Similarly, regulatory T cells (Tregs) [ 13 ], CD146 + T cells [ 14 ] and invariant natural killer T cells [ 15 ] have been evaluated as diagnostic/prognostic biomarkers for acute GVHD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The endothelial damage in HCT is multifactorial and cumulative ( 54 , 55 ) due to the effect of the conditioning regimen, calcineurin inhibitors, infections, graft vs. host disease and processes inherent to HCT such as the engraftment syndrome, among others ( 56 59 ). This endothelial damage leads to a release of proinflammatory cytokines and procoagulant factors together with nitric oxide depletion and an increase in the expression of adhesion molecules at cell surface.…”
Section: Complement Endothelial Damage In Thrombotic Microangiopathiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This damage occurs in the early post-HCT aplastic phase and is generally caused by conditioning regimen in presence of concurrent risk factors (e.g. prolonged immobilization, severe infections, high dose busulfan) ( 43 ). The “second hit” causes further endothelial injury and initiates platelet aggregation and thrombus formation in microvessels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%