Background:
Device-related thrombosis (DRT) after successful closure
implantation on left atrial appendage (LAA) was considered as a major challenge
and optimal strategy on antithrombotic therapy remains to be solved. This study
was performed to compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of reduced
rivaroxaban dose (RRD) and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after left atrial
appendage closure (LAAC) implantation with the Watchman device.
Methods:
After successful LAAC, consecutive participants were medicated with a standard
DAPT or RRD. The primary endpoints included DRT, thrombosis events (TE), and
bleeding events that were documented during a 12-month follow-up period.
Results:
767 patients (DAPT: n = 140; RRD: n = 627) were initially
included. After propensity score matching (PSM), 140 patients treated with DAPT
and 280 patients with RRD were included in each group with similar baseline
information, thromboembolic and bleeding risk factors, cardiovascular risk
factors and concomitant medication. In the RRD group, 193 patients were on
rivaroxaban 15 mg (
) and 47 received rivaroxaban 10 mg (
). The
incidence of DRT was documented in 12 (9.3%) patients in the DAPT group and 3
(6.3%) in
and 7 (3.0%) in
(log-rank
p
= 0.050). DAPT
subgroups were more likely to experience shorter time to DRT as compared to
(
vs
. DAPT hazard ratio (HR) = 0.334,
p
=
0.015, 95% CI: 0.131–0.850). The median length of DRT in the
group was
significantly lower than that of the DAPT group (1.721 [1.610–1.818] mm
vs
. 1.820 [1.725–1.925] mm,
p
= 0.029). Compared with the
unadjusted estimated rates of ischemic events for patients with similar
congestive heart failure, hypertension, age
75 years, diabetes mellitus,
prior stroke or transient ischemic attack or thromboembolism, vascular disease,
age 65–74 years, sex category (
-
) scores, a
significant decrease of 68.6% in ischemic stroke rates was noted in the
group, which contributed to a 54.9% reduction of overall thromboembolic events.
The overall minor bleeding was not significantly different amongst the three
groups (
p
= 0.944). Procedural bleeding was more common in the DAPT
group, as compared with the
and
groups.
Conclusions:
After successful closure implantation, long-term RRD significantly reduced the
DRT and TE occurrence compared with DAPT.