1 Although the actions of angiotensin II (Ang II) on renal haemodynamics appear to be mediated by activation of the AT 1 receptor subtype, AT 2 binding sites have also been evidenced in the adult kidney vasculature. As NO is known to mask part of the renal eects of vasoconstrictor drugs, we queried whether the Ang II-induced vasoconstrictions could occur via multiple receptor subtypes during inhibition of NO synthesis. We explored the eect of AT 1 and AT 2 receptor (AT-R) antagonists on Ang II-induced pressure increases during NO synthase or soluble guanylyl cyclase inhibition in rat isolated kidneys perfused in the presence of indomethacin at constant¯ow in a single-pass circuit. 2 In the absence of NO blockade, the AT 1 -R antagonist L-158809 (500 nM) antagonized the Ang IIinduced vasoconstrictions, while the AT 2 -R antagonist PD-123319 (500 nM) had no eect. 3 Perfusing kidneys in the presence of either NO synthase inhibitors, L-NAME (100 mM) or L-NOARG (1 mM), or soluble guanylyl cyclase inhibitor, LY-83583 (10 mM), signi®cantly increased both molar pD 2 (from 9.40+0.25 to 10.36+0.11) and E max values (from 24.9+3.1 to 79.9+4.9 mmHg) of the concentration ± response curve for Ang II-induced vasoconstriction. 4 In the presence of L-NAME, 500 nM L158809 abolished the Ang II-induced vasoconstrictions whatever the concentration tested. On the other hand, 500 nM PD-123319 reversed the left shift of the concentration ± response curve for Ang II (molar pD 2 value 9.72+0.13) leaving E max value unaected (91.3+7.6 mmHg). 5 In the presence of L-NAME, the potentiated vasoconstriction induced by 0.1 nM and the augmented vasoconstriction induced by 10 nM Ang II were fully inhibited in a concentration-dependent manner by L-158809 (0.05 ± 500 nM). By contrast, PD-123319 (0.5 ± 500 nM) did not aect the 10 nM Ang II-induced vasoconstriction and concentration-dependently decreased the 0.1 nM Ang II-induced vasoconstriction plateauing at 65% inhibition above 5 nM antagonist. 6 Similar to PD-123319, during NO blockade the AT 2 -R antagonist CGP-42112A at 5 nM decreased by 50% the 0.1 nM Ang II-induced vasoconstriction and at 500 nM had no eect on 10 nM Ang II-induced vasoconstriction. 7 In conclusion, the renal Ang II-induced vasoconstriction, which is antagonized only by AT 1 -R antagonist in the presence of endogenous NO, becomes sensitive to both AT 1 -and AT 2 -R antagonists during NO synthesis inhibition. While AT 1 -R antagonist inhibited both L-NAME-potentiated and -augmented components of Ang II-induced vasoconstriction, AT 2 -R antagonists inhibited only the L-NAME-potentiated component.