2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2015.12.176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endotherapy is effective for pancreatic ductal disruption: A dual center experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5,[17][18][19][20][21][22] Further, a multicentre study in adults 23 and a multicentre study in children 16 and several larger single, dual, or multi-centre cohorts were included. [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5,[17][18][19][20][21][22] Further, a multicentre study in adults 23 and a multicentre study in children 16 and several larger single, dual, or multi-centre cohorts were included. [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Successful endoscopic stenting as a final therapy is usually reported to be associated with a relatively low prevalence of trauma-related leaks in these series. 25…”
Section: Hpbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moving forward to the present, the current state of scientific evidence on the topic of endoscopic intervention for pancreatic fistula is limited to retrospective data, mostly case series. More recent, larger retrospective studies that assess endoscopic therapy for PD disruption include mostly patients who manifest with peri-pancreatic fluid collections and only a small number of patients with pancreatic fistulae [15,49,53,54]. Regarding the overlap of peri-pancreatic collection and pancreatic fistula, given the concern for suboptimal drainage and superinfection of the collection with transpapillary therapy alone, consideration should be given to endoscopic transmural drainage especially if a mature fluid collection is larger than 6 centimeters or solid debris is present [55].…”
Section: Endoscopic Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transpapillary stent placement into the disconnected upstream segment is generally unsuccessful, but given the implications an attempt may be worthwhile if the gap is reasonable because successful bridging can occur ( Figure 6). 19,75,76 If the disconnected upstream duct is not initially opacified, placement of a transpapillary stent into the disruption occasionally results in sufficient collapse of the cavity around the stent to restore ductal continuity at the time of follow-up ERCP, but this approach is not evidence-based and some endoscopists prefer to place a stent in the downstream duct. The definitive treatment of this condition is surgery to drain or remove the disconnected segment; however, the operation can be morbid and removal of additional pancreatic parenchyma can lead to diabetes.…”
Section: Disconnected Pancreatic Ductmentioning
confidence: 99%