1990
DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1990.tb14180.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endotoxin‐induced impairment of vasopressor and vasodepressor responses in the pithed rat

Abstract: 1 Effects of E. coli endotoxin on vascular responsiveness to a variety of agents were compared with those of the calcium channel blocking drug nicardipine in pithed rats. 2 Infusion of endotoxin (250pgkg -h-') produced a fall in mean arterial blood pressure (8 mmHg). A similar fall (11 mmHg) was seen in rats receiving nicardipine (1.0 mg kg-'). 3 Endotoxin impaired responsiveness to vasopressin, phenylephrine and cirazoline, producing a shift to the right in the dose-response curves without any change in the m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two hours after the beginning of LPS infusion, the diminished pressor and carotid, mesenteric and hindquarters vasoconstrictor effects of methoxamine are consistent with reports of vascular hyporeactivity to a variety of vasoconstrictor agents in other rat models (Fink et al, 1985;Schaller et al, 1985;Guc et al, 1990;Hollenberg et al, 1993) and in man (Chernow et al, 1982). It is generally agreed that NOmediated mechanisms are involved (see Moncada et al, 1991) and, if so, it is interesting that not all vascular beds responded uniformly and that the pattern of hyporesponsiveness changed with time during LPS infusion (see below).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Two hours after the beginning of LPS infusion, the diminished pressor and carotid, mesenteric and hindquarters vasoconstrictor effects of methoxamine are consistent with reports of vascular hyporeactivity to a variety of vasoconstrictor agents in other rat models (Fink et al, 1985;Schaller et al, 1985;Guc et al, 1990;Hollenberg et al, 1993) and in man (Chernow et al, 1982). It is generally agreed that NOmediated mechanisms are involved (see Moncada et al, 1991) and, if so, it is interesting that not all vascular beds responded uniformly and that the pattern of hyporesponsiveness changed with time during LPS infusion (see below).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…It is becoming clearer that NO may act both as friend and foe in septic states (15). Since many deleterious effects of endotoxins, such as hypotension (16) and vascular hyporesponsiveness (17) to vasoconstrictors (18) and vasodilators (19), could be explained by excess NO production (20), the inhibition of NO to combat septic shock was regarded as essential until recently. The usefulness of an NO-inhibiting drug for the treatment of human toxic shock syndrome in an isolated case report (21) has enhanced this belief.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SEPTIC SHOCK IS A COMPLEX pathological state characterized by systemic vasodilation and hyporesponsiveness to vasoconstrictor agents (12,32,38,39). Numerous experimental studies of sepsis have clearly documented the presence of both in vivo and in vitro vascular hyporesponsiveness to different vasoconstrictors, including ␣-adrenergic agonists (7,12), angiotensin II (38), KCl (38,39), endothelin-1 (ET-1) (4,17), and thromboxane A 2 (2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous experimental studies of sepsis have clearly documented the presence of both in vivo and in vitro vascular hyporesponsiveness to different vasoconstrictors, including ␣-adrenergic agonists (7,12), angiotensin II (38), KCl (38,39), endothelin-1 (ET-1) (4,17), and thromboxane A 2 (2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation