2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endovascular Chimney Technique for Aortic Arch Pathologies Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our results are comparable to a meta-analysis on chimney graft technique for aortic arch pathologies, with a pooled technical success rate of 91%. 37 The frequency of endoleaks was comparable to previously reported figures 38 ; however, we acknowledge that an endoleak which may be tolerable in an elective aneurysm setting may not be so in a BTTAI. Although the endoleak resolved spontaneously in one patient, it does not allow for a firm conclusion on whether this is the expected sequela in all untreated endoleaks.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…However, our results are comparable to a meta-analysis on chimney graft technique for aortic arch pathologies, with a pooled technical success rate of 91%. 37 The frequency of endoleaks was comparable to previously reported figures 38 ; however, we acknowledge that an endoleak which may be tolerable in an elective aneurysm setting may not be so in a BTTAI. Although the endoleak resolved spontaneously in one patient, it does not allow for a firm conclusion on whether this is the expected sequela in all untreated endoleaks.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The official recommendations of the European Society for Vascular Surgery suggest TEVAR as the treatment of choice in these cases. 9,10 The endovascular approach for the aortic arch has progressed from options such as chimney technique, in situ fenestrations, and hybrid arch procedures [11][12][13] to more sophisticated endovascular solutions, such as branched or fenestrated arch repair. 14 Experience with these procedures has reached a level of maturity after overcoming the initial learning curve.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chimney was an option; however, the rate of type 1 endoleak for this repair in the aortic arch remains sustainable. 8 In situ fenestration of the supra-aortic trunks was a feasible option that requires the use of an extracorporeal circulation. 9 The alternative hybrid option requiring total debranching of supra-aortic trunks and bypass from the ascending aorta combined with a standard endograft was obviously more invasive and associated with a significant risk of de-containing the rupture during the ascending aorta exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%