2015
DOI: 10.1186/s12893-015-0005-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm with severely angulated neck and tortuous artery access: case report and literature review

Abstract: BackgroundEndovascular aneurysm repair has revolutionized the therapeutic strategy for abdominal aortic aneurysm. However, hostile proximal aneurysmal neck and tortuosity of access vessels remain challenges in selecting optimal stent-grafts in abdominal aortic aneurysms with difficult anatomy.Case presentationA 65-year-old woman complained of intermittent abdominal pain for one week. Computed tomography angiogram demonstrated a tortuous infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm with a tapered neck and a 136° of inf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…14 Treatment of a highly angulated neck (136°) in a quite long proximal aortic neck (23 mm) with the standard Gore Excluder device outside IFU was previously reported in literature. 15 We believe that the association of high adaptability in tortuous anatomy of the standard graft, the conformable flexibility of the proximal end and the reposition system could be the ideal approach to SNA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Treatment of a highly angulated neck (136°) in a quite long proximal aortic neck (23 mm) with the standard Gore Excluder device outside IFU was previously reported in literature. 15 We believe that the association of high adaptability in tortuous anatomy of the standard graft, the conformable flexibility of the proximal end and the reposition system could be the ideal approach to SNA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,13 These factors, in combination with patient comorbidities, may have played a role in the development of the early endoleaks. However, one cannot entirely rule out the possibility of operator error, such as incorrect graft sizing or positioning, Hostile anatomies pose a restriction to widespread application of EVAR 14 : a meta-analysis comparing outcomes of 5 devices (AneuRx, Talent, Endurant, Zenith, and Excluder) in hostile versus nonhostile anatomy demonstrated a 4-fold increased risk of type I endoleaks and a 9-fold increased risk of aneurysm-related mortality at 1 year. 15 In our experience, however, the performance of Treovance in patients with hostile neck anatomies was comparable to those with nonhostile anatomies, with no statistical difference in adjunctive procedure, reintervention, and complication occurrence ( Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfavorable neck angulation greater than 60 degrees has been considered to be a contraindication to EVAR, although recent studies using more modern, conformable endografts have demonstrated the efficacy of EVAR treatment in patients with unfavorable neck angulation without significant differences in primary or secondary outcomes of EVAR 4 years out (21,(45)(46)(47). Further long-term results with these modern endograft devices are still ongoing (47).…”
Section: Imaging Tools For Surgical Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%