2024
DOI: 10.5853/jos.2023.04259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endovascular Therapy in the Extended Time Window for Large Vessel Occlusion in Patients With Pre-Stroke Disability

Kanta Tanaka,
Hiroshi Yamagami,
Muhammad M. Qureshi
et al.

Abstract: Background and Purpose We compared the outcomes of endovascular therapy (EVT) in an extended time window in patients with large-vessel occlusion (LVO) between patients with and without pre-stroke disability.Methods In this prespecified analysis of the multinational CT for Late Endovascular Reperfusion study (66 participating sites, 10 countries between 2014 and 2022), we analyzed data from patients with acute ischemic stroke with a pre-stroke modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0–4 and LVO who underwent EVT 6… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
(144 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The primary outcome was a “good functional outcome,” defined as 90‐day mRS score of 0 to 2, or return to prestroke mRS score, as described previously. 3 , 5 , 34 This outcome was selected due to inclusion of patients with preexisting disability, who would have been unlikely to improve to a mRS score of 0 to 2 by 90 days, and for whom a return to a baseline level of disability is a desirable outcome. Secondary outcomes included functional independence (90‐day mRS score 0–2), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH, defined by the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study III as an intracranial hemorrhage associated with a deterioration in NIHSS score ≥4 points), 35 poor outcome (90‐day mRS score 5–6), and mortality at 90 days.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary outcome was a “good functional outcome,” defined as 90‐day mRS score of 0 to 2, or return to prestroke mRS score, as described previously. 3 , 5 , 34 This outcome was selected due to inclusion of patients with preexisting disability, who would have been unlikely to improve to a mRS score of 0 to 2 by 90 days, and for whom a return to a baseline level of disability is a desirable outcome. Secondary outcomes included functional independence (90‐day mRS score 0–2), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH, defined by the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study III as an intracranial hemorrhage associated with a deterioration in NIHSS score ≥4 points), 35 poor outcome (90‐day mRS score 5–6), and mortality at 90 days.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%