2017
DOI: 10.1093/ons/opx032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endovascular Treatment of Large and Giant Carotid Aneurysms with Flow-Diverter Stents Alone or in Combination with Coils: A Multicenter Experience and Long-Term Follow-up

Abstract: Clinical outcomes and rates of intraoperative and postoperative complications did not differ significantly between the groups. Better anatomic results using FD/FDs combined with coils were documented 6 months after the procedure; this option seems to provide a higher aneurysm occlusion rate and reduce the need for retreatment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
24
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Flow diversion seems to be useful for the treatment of wide necked and/or sidewall aneurysms, fusiform, and dissecting aneurysms, as well as for large and giant aneurysms. For the latter, additional coiling should be considered in order to reduce the risk for subacute rupture and to enhance stable long-term occlusion (Kulcsár et al 2011;Peschillo et al 2017). Flow diversion can be used as an alternative to coiling Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flow diversion seems to be useful for the treatment of wide necked and/or sidewall aneurysms, fusiform, and dissecting aneurysms, as well as for large and giant aneurysms. For the latter, additional coiling should be considered in order to reduce the risk for subacute rupture and to enhance stable long-term occlusion (Kulcsár et al 2011;Peschillo et al 2017). Flow diversion can be used as an alternative to coiling Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A single-center study (19) suggested that treatment with Pipeline and coils resulted in a higher embolization rate compared with Pipeline alone for aneurysms <10 mm. Peschillo et al (20) also reported that, for large and giant carotid aneurysms, treatment with flow-diverter stents in combination with coils may provide a higher aneurysm occlusion rate and reduce the requirement for retreatment compared with the use of flow-diverter stents alone. However, to date, there is no objective method for determining the appropriate degree of packing coils for giant aneurysms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of this method is entirely based on the individual judgement of the neurointerventionist. Combined PED and coil embolization can speed up the complete embolization of aneurysms and reduce the recurrence rate of aneurysms (12,26). At the same time, it also increases the complexity of the operation, while there is no consensus on whether it increases the overall complication of the operation (13).…”
Section: Ped With Adjunctive Coilsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, there are still no firmly accepted therapeutic methods for using PED. Previous studies (12) have reported that PED combined with coils may be appropriate for some larger aneurysms, and this treatment strategy has worked in the anterior circulation. However, because of the rarity of large or giant vertebrobasilar aneurysm (LGVBA) cases, there is still little experience of PED treatment for LGVBAs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%