2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2007.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endovenous Radiofrequency Ablation of Superficial and Perforator Veins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
20
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…EVOLEeS [2] trial showed a neovascularisation rate of 3% with conventional closure technique and 17% with stripping. The present technique also has a positive potential on the overall cost of treatment because of the immediate ambulation compared to more than 2 weeks of no work and hospitalisation by doing a traditional surgery [10]. 95% patients in the present study returned to normal activities within one day of the closure fast procedure; this outcome was observed to be even better than that shown by EVOLVeS [2] using the conventional closure technique where 80% patients resumed their activity after 24 hours of procedure compared to only 47% by stripping.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…EVOLEeS [2] trial showed a neovascularisation rate of 3% with conventional closure technique and 17% with stripping. The present technique also has a positive potential on the overall cost of treatment because of the immediate ambulation compared to more than 2 weeks of no work and hospitalisation by doing a traditional surgery [10]. 95% patients in the present study returned to normal activities within one day of the closure fast procedure; this outcome was observed to be even better than that shown by EVOLVeS [2] using the conventional closure technique where 80% patients resumed their activity after 24 hours of procedure compared to only 47% by stripping.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…3 Subsequently, shrinkage and contraction of the vein wall ensues. 5 One of the unique complications of this treatment can be the formation of thrombus in the proximal GSV, which may extend for varying degrees into the femoral vein lumen.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15, 35–37 Side effects of perforator ablation include ecchymosis, induration, and pain in the majority of cases, while paresthesias, hyperpigmentation, and phlebitis occur in the minority of cases. 27, 38, 39 Multiple needle punctures during sclerotherapy can lead to vasospasm or hematoma, but in our population, the common side effects seen during ablation were minimal. Patients tolerated sclerotherapy much more comfortably than ablation therapy and often recover faster.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%