2013
DOI: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2013.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endovenous removal of dislodged left renal vein stent in a patient with nutcracker syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, this study also highlighted the importance of adequate stent sizing. Further less common complications reported in single case experiences include stent embolisation, 69,70 in-stent restenosis, 35 and pseudo-intimal proliferation or thrombosis 10,36 or fracture with resultant vessel occlusion. 68 These complications are attributed mainly to the type and size of the stent, balloon dilation, and the extent of experience of the operator when performing this procedure.…”
Section: Surgical Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, this study also highlighted the importance of adequate stent sizing. Further less common complications reported in single case experiences include stent embolisation, 69,70 in-stent restenosis, 35 and pseudo-intimal proliferation or thrombosis 10,36 or fracture with resultant vessel occlusion. 68 These complications are attributed mainly to the type and size of the stent, balloon dilation, and the extent of experience of the operator when performing this procedure.…”
Section: Surgical Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stenting presents the potential risk of migration, fracture, or, rarely, in-stent thrombosis. Instances of stent migration into the IVC4, 6, 7 or heart3, 8, 9, 10 have been reported requiring endovascular procedures, open cavotomy, or sternotomy to retrieve the stent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main reason behind that was inappropriate stent sizing. 2,10,22,[24][25][26] The risk of stent migration can be minimised by oversizing the stent diameter. While partial protrusion of the stent into the inferior vena cava did not seem to cause complications, distal landing beyond the first branch of the LRV had been suggested to reduce stent migration but this is not to be encouraged due to the long-term disruption of smaller branches by the continuous radial force of the stent.…”
Section: Endovascular Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%