2009
DOI: 10.1112/jlms/jdp033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endpoint bounds for a generalized Radon transform

Abstract: We prove that convolution with affine arclength measure on the curve parametrized by h(t) := (t, t 2 , . . . , t n ) is a bounded operator from L p (R n ) to L q (R n ) for the full conjectured range of exponents, improving on a result due to M. Christ. We also obtain nearly sharp Lorentz space bounds.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a remarkable result of Christ [9] that (up to the endpoints) these restrictions on p and q are in fact sufficient for (1) to hold in this non-degenerate situation. Stovall [30], building on an argument of Christ [10], has converted Christ's restricted weak-type estimates at the endpoints into strong type estimates.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a remarkable result of Christ [9] that (up to the endpoints) these restrictions on p and q are in fact sufficient for (1) to hold in this non-degenerate situation. Stovall [30], building on an argument of Christ [10], has converted Christ's restricted weak-type estimates at the endpoints into strong type estimates.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method was applied in [9] to prove strong-type estimates for the operator in (1) in the cases d = 2, 3 and in [27] to prove strong-type estimates for convolution with affine arclength measure along the moment curve. Using Christ's techniques, one can show that the next two lemmas imply Theorem 1.…”
Section: Reduction Of Theorem 1 To Two Lemmasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using Christ's techniques, one can show that the next two lemmas imply Theorem 1. See [27] for details. For notational convenience, we define the quantity…”
Section: Reduction Of Theorem 1 To Two Lemmasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations