2007
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.0968-07.2007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endpoint Stiffness of the Arm Is Directionally Tuned to Instability in the Environment

Abstract: It has been shown that humans are able to selectively control the endpoint impedance of their arms when moving in an unstable environment. However, directional instability was only examined for the case in which the main contribution was from coactivation of biarticular muscles. The goal of this study was to examine whether, in general, the CNS activates the sets of muscles that contribute to selective control of impedance in particular directions. Subjects performed reaching movements in three differently ori… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

16
240
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 277 publications
(257 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
16
240
1
Order By: Relevance
“…During human reaching in the presence of expected mechanical perturbations (Burdet et al, 2001;Franklin et al, 2007), arm stiffness tends to increase compared with reaching without perturbations. The nervous system may respond to expected lower limb perturbations similarly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During human reaching in the presence of expected mechanical perturbations (Burdet et al, 2001;Franklin et al, 2007), arm stiffness tends to increase compared with reaching without perturbations. The nervous system may respond to expected lower limb perturbations similarly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This internal representation appears to be used for both feedforward (anticipatory) (Lackner and Dizio, 1994;Shadmehr and Mussa-Ivaldi, 1994;Flanagan and Wing, 1997;Krakauer et al, 1999;McIntyre et al, 2001;Singh and Scott, 2003) and feedback (Todorov and Jordan, 2002;Franklin et al, 2007;Kurtzer et al, 2008) control. Although there is some controversy as to whether the internal representation comprises inverse and/or forward models of the task dynamics (Ostry and Feldman, 2003;Pasalar et al, 2006;Yamamoto et al, 2007), it is clear that to ensure stable control when the environmental forces arise from unpredictability or mechanical instability it must also have the capacity to regulate mechanical impedance (Hogan, 1984;Burdet et al, 2001;Franklin et al, 2004Franklin et al, , 2007. Feedforward control of mechanical impedance is necessary in biological systems because neural delays preclude the use of feedback to compensate for instability in the environment (Mehta and Schaal, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, exerting forces against a screwdriver decreases limb stability in directions orthogonal to the driver, towards which buckling is possible, but not along the axis of the driver, which is extremely stiff relative to the arm. Feedforward motor commands can adapt to such direction dependent instabilities [4], but is it unclear if such specificity exists in reflex pathways providing feedback control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%