“…While it was not new to report the interplay between the othering of China and the unfolding of U.S. self-imagination (see, e.g., Jannuzi, 2003; Kim, 2010), the analysis and interpretation of the “us–them” paradigm featured in this study typified a pioneering endeavor in the sense that they put forth an empirical and elaborated account of how the politics of global inequities, as reflected through the identified discourses governing the inferiority/superiority divisions between China and the United States, were effectively perpetuated through ISM from China. In other words, ISM from China tended to become a vehicle for reiterating the enduring colonial order of a U.S./West-led notion of knowledge and development, thereby ratifying the continued legitimacy of U.S. exceptionalism.…”