“…are not analyzed with the method of Cooper (2005) and colleagues (2007), it does hold the promise of proving useful in better understanding bone quality in past populations. More specifically, it offers a 3D view of the pore systems in cortical bone, which are affected by factors such as genetics (e.g., Weinstein and Bell, 1988;Cho et al, 2006;Schnitzler et al, 2009), sex (e.g., Cho et al, 2006;MacDonald et al, 2011;Nishiyama et al 2012;Kazakia et al, 2013), age (e.g., Jowsey, 1966;Cho et al, 2006;Cooper et al, 2007;Burghardt et al, 2010;MacDonald et al, 2011), diet (e.g., Martin et al 1987Stout and Jackson, 1990;Paine and Brenton, 2006a,b), environment (e.g., Cho et al, 2006;Brickley et al, 2007;Petrone et al, 2011), and activity (e.g., Skedros, 1994Skedros, , 1997Skedros, , 2004van Oers et al, 2008a,b). Additionally, mCT has the potential to circumvent problems associated with diagenetically altered bone because it relies on the preservation of Haversian canals, which are less susceptible to damage due to highly mineralized canal walls (Hanson and Buikstra, 1987;Samson and Branigan, 1987).…”