2021
DOI: 10.35686/ar.2021.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eneolitický kostrový pohřební ritus na Moravě ve světle radiokarbonového datování / The Eneolithic inhumation burial rite in Moravia in light of radiocarbon dating

Abstract: The article addresses the chronology of Eneolithic inhumation burials in Moravia based on radiocarbon dating. A total of 17 individuals were dated using 20 radiocarbon dates, primarily individuals without grave goods or individuals from problematic contexts. The study mainly covers the period of the Early Eneolithic, to a lesser extent the Middle and Late Eneolithic. The find contexts and anthropological assessments are newly published for most of the burials in question. Based on the chronological analysis of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the territory of Moravia (Czechia), a number of archaeological sites with this culture are still known (Šmíd 2017), but there are not many necropolises with skeletal remains, and the retrieved osteological collections only include the skeletons of a small number of individuals (e.g. Drozdová 2011;Trampota et al 2021). When studying small osteological collections, attention was mostly focused on standard anthropological analysis, or only interesting case studies were recorded and described (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the territory of Moravia (Czechia), a number of archaeological sites with this culture are still known (Šmíd 2017), but there are not many necropolises with skeletal remains, and the retrieved osteological collections only include the skeletons of a small number of individuals (e.g. Drozdová 2011;Trampota et al 2021). When studying small osteological collections, attention was mostly focused on standard anthropological analysis, or only interesting case studies were recorded and described (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%