2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.12.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energetics of electrochemically mediated amine regeneration process for flue gas CO2 capture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
114
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
114
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20). The electrical energy consumption of this capture-release process was calculated to be ~56 kJ mol −1 CO 2 (Supplementary Note 2), which is on par with other carbon capture systems 44 . A more detailed energetic analysis of quinone-mediated carbon capture in a conventional electrolyte can be found in a recent literature 16 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…20). The electrical energy consumption of this capture-release process was calculated to be ~56 kJ mol −1 CO 2 (Supplementary Note 2), which is on par with other carbon capture systems 44 . A more detailed energetic analysis of quinone-mediated carbon capture in a conventional electrolyte can be found in a recent literature 16 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Once CO 2 is removed from the solution, the Cu 2+ is plated out onto the cathode and the solution is ready to be used again. Thermodynamic analysis of this process indicates that the energy requirement for regeneration is approximately ∼35–40 kJ/mol CO 2 ( Wang et al., 2019 , 2020 ), which is comparable to the energy requirement of thermal swing processes using monoethanolamine, MEA (40 kJ/mol CO 2 ), and piperazine (38 kJ/mol CO 2 ). The true advantage of the EMAR system is its “plug-and-play” nature.…”
Section: Electrochemically Mediated Co 2 Separationmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The source of inefficiency might be due to the re-absorption of the desorbed gas by the electrolyte, as predicted in our previous investigation. 16 During the desorption, CO 2 loading (dened as C CO2 / C CO2_initial ) decreased and reached the nal value of $0.6, indicating $80% desorption of the initially absorbed CO 2 by the K 2 CO 3 absorbent during the electrochemical process. It should be noted that a CO 2 loading of 0.5 indicates 100% desorption, as half of the total initial CO 2 was introduced by the K 2 CO 3 absorbent.…”
Section: Continuous Co 2 Desorptionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Every one hour, the CO 2 content of the anolyte was measured with a titration method that we previously developed. 16 The amount of CO 2 desorbed was calculated by subtraction of the CO 2 content at a given time from the initial content. The experiment started with the same electrolyte for the anolyte and catholyte, containing 0.5 M K 2 CO 3 absorbent and 0.5 M KCl as the supporting electrolyte.…”
Section: Flow Cell Conguration and Operationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation