2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.83.045206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energetics of intrinsic defects and their complexes in ZnO investigated by density functional calculations

Abstract: Formation energies of various intrinsic defects and defect complexes in ZnO have been calculated using a density-functional-theory-based pseudopotential all-electron method. The various defects considered are oxygen vacancy ( Upon comparing the formation energies of these defects, we find that V O would be the dominant intrinsic defect under both Zn-rich and O-rich conditions and it is a deep double donor. Both Zn O and Zn i are found to be shallow donors. The low formation energy of donor-type intrinsic defec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

12
130
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
12
130
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As the Fermi level is generally accepted to lie itself 0.067 eV below the CBM in the grain boundary region 33 of ZnO varistor, the individual Zn i in the 1+ state is favored since, for instance, the (1+/0) and (2+/1+) transition levels are located at 0.05 and 0.16 eV respectively below the CBM in Zn-rich n-type ZnO as suggested by Vidya et al, 64 while the V O is neutral simultaneously. 64,66 Specifically, we adopt the proposal by Kim and Park 76 in this paper in favor of the novel interaction between component point defects inside the complex donor (V O 0 -Zn 2+ i ), 64,76 i.e. the strong attractive interaction between V O 0 and Zn 2+ i caused by quantum mechanical hybridization significantly lowers the formation enthalpy of the V O 0 -Zn 2+ i pairs, which makes it possible for Zn 2+ i to be generated in large quantities in DSB region.…”
Section: Identification Of Dominant Mobile Ionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As the Fermi level is generally accepted to lie itself 0.067 eV below the CBM in the grain boundary region 33 of ZnO varistor, the individual Zn i in the 1+ state is favored since, for instance, the (1+/0) and (2+/1+) transition levels are located at 0.05 and 0.16 eV respectively below the CBM in Zn-rich n-type ZnO as suggested by Vidya et al, 64 while the V O is neutral simultaneously. 64,66 Specifically, we adopt the proposal by Kim and Park 76 in this paper in favor of the novel interaction between component point defects inside the complex donor (V O 0 -Zn 2+ i ), 64,76 i.e. the strong attractive interaction between V O 0 and Zn 2+ i caused by quantum mechanical hybridization significantly lowers the formation enthalpy of the V O 0 -Zn 2+ i pairs, which makes it possible for Zn 2+ i to be generated in large quantities in DSB region.…”
Section: Identification Of Dominant Mobile Ionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…4,6,57,[59][60][61] However, recent atomic-scale investigations focused on point defects in ZnO materials that use first-principles calculations methods have brought to attention refreshed and distinct insight into the properties of defects. Even though various researches carried out by different groups could show certain disparities in predicting the characteristics of native defects inside periodic-structure ZnO system, [62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74] owing to employing different exchange-correlation approximations, numbers of k-point sampling for Brillouin-zone integration, supercell sizes, corrections for spurious defect interactions, and so forth, meaningful and significant conclusions can still be extracted for native donor defect: (i) V O is the lowest-energy donor defect which means it can be generated in large concentration, whereas it is surprisingly a deep donor, i.e. its (2+/0) transitional level lies ∼1 eV below the conduction band minimum (CBM) and V O at 1+ charge state is unstable; (ii) the formation energy of shallow-donor Zn i is higher compared to V O , and its thermal-dynamic (1+/0) and (2+/1+) transitional levels are predicted as 0.05 and 0.16 eV below the CBM by R. Vidya, 64 and as ∼ 0.05 and ∼ 0.1 eV by F. Oba.…”
Section: Identification Of Dominant Mobile Ionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations