“…4,6,57,[59][60][61] However, recent atomic-scale investigations focused on point defects in ZnO materials that use first-principles calculations methods have brought to attention refreshed and distinct insight into the properties of defects. Even though various researches carried out by different groups could show certain disparities in predicting the characteristics of native defects inside periodic-structure ZnO system, [62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74] owing to employing different exchange-correlation approximations, numbers of k-point sampling for Brillouin-zone integration, supercell sizes, corrections for spurious defect interactions, and so forth, meaningful and significant conclusions can still be extracted for native donor defect: (i) V O is the lowest-energy donor defect which means it can be generated in large concentration, whereas it is surprisingly a deep donor, i.e. its (2+/0) transitional level lies ∼1 eV below the conduction band minimum (CBM) and V O at 1+ charge state is unstable; (ii) the formation energy of shallow-donor Zn i is higher compared to V O , and its thermal-dynamic (1+/0) and (2+/1+) transitional levels are predicted as 0.05 and 0.16 eV below the CBM by R. Vidya, 64 and as ∼ 0.05 and ∼ 0.1 eV by F. Oba.…”