Seabirds fly considerable distances during the breeding season in search for food for themselves and their young. Variation in the distance from the breeding colony to the offshore food resources is expected to impact the energy spent on foraging trips. In 2005-06 and 2006-07 we studied foraging behaviour, derived time budgets during foraging trips (commuting, hunting or drifting on the sea surface) and measured the associated energy expenditure in 2 colonies of breeding Cape gannets Morus capensis. Around Ichaboe Island (Namibia) the winds were stronger and more variable than at Malgas Island (South Africa). Gannet foraging trip duration did not vary between the islands, but at Ichaboe gannets spent more time on hunting and less time drifting on the sea surface compared to Malgas birds. Gannets from Malgas made more dives during foraging trips than Ichaboe gannets (75 and 43 dives respectively). Energy expenditure during foraging trips (TEE) was estimated on average at 4203 kJ d -1 (± 693, n = 27), which was 5.5 × basal metabolic rate (BMR), and did not differ between the islands. Energetic costs of foraging increased with wind speed and the fraction flying during foraging trips. The average flight costs were estimated at 85 W, after correction for wind speed. The increased energetic cost during foraging at Malgas was associated with the large number of dives and less profitable winds: taking off after each plunge-dive would be more costly in weaker winds. The fact that TEE did not differ between the islands might suggest that Cape gannets at both islands were foraging at the boundaries of their sustainable energetic expenditure.
KEY WORDS: Energetics · Environmental conditions · Foraging behaviour · Time budgets · Trip energy expenditure
Resale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisherMar Ecol Prog Ser 393: [161][162][163][164][165][166][167][168][169][170][171] 2009 major component of marine birds' energy budgets. Energy expenditure of pelagic seabirds can therefore be twice as high as those of land birds (Ellis & Gabrielsen 2002, Tieleman & Williams 2000.Seabirds have evolved behavioural and morphological adaptations that minimise the energetic costs of flying. The high aspect-ratio of many seabird wings most likely evolved to take advantage of prevailing oceanic winds to soar and decrease flying costs (e.g. Schreiber & Chovan 1986, Weimerskirch et al. 2000. For example, albatrosses conserve energy by optimising the use of wind conditions during dynamic soaring flights (Weimerskirch et al. 2000). Body morphology of albatrosses does not allow sustained flapping flight (Alerstam et al. 1993), causing them also to remain at the sea surface during periods of slack winds to conserve energy (Jouventin & Weimerskirch 1990). Strong winds are not always advantageous: strong headwinds can significantly increase the foraging costs (Weimerskirch et al. 2000) and also stir up the sea surface, which makes it harder for seabirds to locate prey from the air (Finney et al. 1999).Whi...