2021
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/abc8e8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energetics of Solar Coronal Bright Points

Abstract: The several-million-degree, low-density quiet solar corona requires a total energy-loss flux of about 3 × 105 erg cm−2 s−1. Solar coronal bright points (CBPs) are ubiquitous in the quiet Sun. They may release magnetic energy to heat the solar corona, but their contribution to the energy flux has not been determined yet. We used an automatic identification and tracking method for CBPs, which was developed based on the support vector machine classifier and Zernike moments of extreme ultraviolet (EUV) observation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
4
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The power law index (for peak intensity and total intensity of campfires as a class of small-scale events) greater than 2 is in agreement with the previous findings for energetic events (e.g., Krucker & Benz 1998;Pauluhn & Solanki 2007b;Bazarghan et al 2008;Tajfirouze & Safari 2012;Reale 2014). Furthermore, the power law index of about 2.7 for the peak intensity distribution of campfires is in the range of indices obtained for the distribution of energy-loss flux of CBPs (Hosseini Rad et al 2021). Generally, however, when deriving a power law index, there are error sources such as the instrument sensitivity, performance of a feature detection method (identification and tracking), estimation of modeling parameters, and the specific time of observations at a solar cycle (e.g., Parnell & Jupp 2000;Parnell 2002;Hosseini Rad et al 2021).…”
Section: Hri Euv Brighteningssupporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The power law index (for peak intensity and total intensity of campfires as a class of small-scale events) greater than 2 is in agreement with the previous findings for energetic events (e.g., Krucker & Benz 1998;Pauluhn & Solanki 2007b;Bazarghan et al 2008;Tajfirouze & Safari 2012;Reale 2014). Furthermore, the power law index of about 2.7 for the peak intensity distribution of campfires is in the range of indices obtained for the distribution of energy-loss flux of CBPs (Hosseini Rad et al 2021). Generally, however, when deriving a power law index, there are error sources such as the instrument sensitivity, performance of a feature detection method (identification and tracking), estimation of modeling parameters, and the specific time of observations at a solar cycle (e.g., Parnell & Jupp 2000;Parnell 2002;Hosseini Rad et al 2021).…”
Section: Hri Euv Brighteningssupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Furthermore, the power law index of about 2.7 for the peak intensity distribution of campfires is in the range of indices obtained for the distribution of energy-loss flux of CBPs (Hosseini Rad et al 2021). Generally, however, when deriving a power law index, there are error sources such as the instrument sensitivity, performance of a feature detection method (identification and tracking), estimation of modeling parameters, and the specific time of observations at a solar cycle (e.g., Parnell & Jupp 2000;Parnell 2002;Hosseini Rad et al 2021). An accurate determination of the power law index for the energy distribution of flaring-like instabilities (from picoflares to large X-class flares) and their generating mechanisms is still an open problem (Verbeeck et al 2019).…”
Section: Hri Euv Brighteningssupporting
confidence: 51%
“…We note that the field strength is the average along the loop, without considering the change of density with height. For most oscillation events, the estimated magnetic fields are rather small, just around 1-3 G. However, previous measurements of the CBP electron densities show a range of 10 15 -10 16 m −3 (Madjarska 2019;Hosseini Rad et al 2021). Meanwhile, as mentioned in Section 4.1, we are likely to underestimate the loop length, which will lead to an underestimation of the kink speed, the Alfvén speed, and consequently the magnetic field strength.…”
Section: 6 I I W Rnmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Quasiperiodic oscillations with periods from minutes to hours are also reported in CBPs (Tian et al 2008;Samanta et al 2015). CBPs can be found everywhere at the solar atmosphere and appear significantly to coincide with magnetic neutral lines, which should play an important role for understanding the coronal heating (Priest et al 1994;Shibata et al 2007;Tian et al 2007;Hosseini Rad et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%