2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.05.090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy absorption and failure mechanism of metallic cylindrical sandwich shells under impact loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Faces are generally made of metal alloys [1], fiber reinforced composites [2] or fiber metal laminates [3] and are responsible for carrying the transverse loads or bending moments. The core of sandwich structures comprises of honeycombs [4], corrugated materials [5], polymeric/metallic foams [6,7], lattices [8] or balsa wood [9] and is responsible for absorbing the impact energy by local plastic deformation whilst still offering enough overall support to prevent high local bending strains in the facesheets. A comprehensive review of the current trends in the research and applications of sandwich structures is done by Birman and Kardomateas, [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Faces are generally made of metal alloys [1], fiber reinforced composites [2] or fiber metal laminates [3] and are responsible for carrying the transverse loads or bending moments. The core of sandwich structures comprises of honeycombs [4], corrugated materials [5], polymeric/metallic foams [6,7], lattices [8] or balsa wood [9] and is responsible for absorbing the impact energy by local plastic deformation whilst still offering enough overall support to prevent high local bending strains in the facesheets. A comprehensive review of the current trends in the research and applications of sandwich structures is done by Birman and Kardomateas, [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relative density Generally speaking, the impact resistance of structures is beneficial to the high core energy absorption (Jing, et al, 2013;Li, et al, 2014).As depicted in Figure 8, among all three single-layer sandwich panels, back face sheet hardly absorbs energy by plastic dissipation and most of plastic dissipation happen to front face sheet and core and moreover front face sheet dissipates more energy than core. Xue and Hutchinson (2003) concluded that the energy distribution is sensitive to the mass distribution caused by the increasing of relative density.…”
Section: Latin American Journal Of Solids and Structures 13 (2016) 28mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quasi-static uniaxial compressive stress-strain curves of the foam with three different relative densities (10%, 15%, and 20%) are plotted in Figure 3. Here, maximum shear strain (MSS=0.4) was used to define the failure criteria of the foam core (Jing et al, 2013). The aluminium alloy face-sheets were represented by material model 104 of LS_DYNA (MAT_DAMAGE_1).…”
Section: Materials Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%