1994
DOI: 10.1016/0969-806x(94)90177-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy absorption buildup factor studies in water, air and concrete up to 100 mfp using G-P fitting formula

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The GP fitting formula is known to be accurate within the estimated uncertainty (< 5%), and Harima carried out an extensive historical review and reported the current gamma photon build-up factors and applications (Harima, 1993). Various researchers have investigated gamma-ray build-up factors in different materials fly-ash, concretes (Brar et al, 1994;Singh et al, 2010;Badiger, 2012a, 2012b), solvents (Parjit et al, 2008), polymers (Tejbir et al, 2010;, human tissues , soils & ceramic (Sandeep and Gurdeep, 2012;Jasbir et al, 2012;Tejbir et al, 2013), and fly ash (Sukhpal et al, 2010), which showed that GP fitting is a very useful method for estimation of exposure and energy absorption build-up factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GP fitting formula is known to be accurate within the estimated uncertainty (< 5%), and Harima carried out an extensive historical review and reported the current gamma photon build-up factors and applications (Harima, 1993). Various researchers have investigated gamma-ray build-up factors in different materials fly-ash, concretes (Brar et al, 1994;Singh et al, 2010;Badiger, 2012a, 2012b), solvents (Parjit et al, 2008), polymers (Tejbir et al, 2010;, human tissues , soils & ceramic (Sandeep and Gurdeep, 2012;Jasbir et al, 2012;Tejbir et al, 2013), and fly ash (Sukhpal et al, 2010), which showed that GP fitting is a very useful method for estimation of exposure and energy absorption build-up factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and 0.218 cm respectively. These are lower when compared to 0.417 cm, the value of that of heavy (steel magnetite) concrete [32] at the same energy. This is an interesting result since the density of the heavy concrete of 5.11 g/cm 3 is higher than those of the glass samples.…”
Section: Half-value Layer (Hvl) and Mean Free Path (Mfp)mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Park and Jeong (2016) analysed uncertainties in the weighted least squares fitted buildup factors in the point kernel method. Most of the researchers studied the energy absorption buildup factors using the geometric progression method (Kurudirek and Özdemi, 2011;Manohara et al, 2010;Mann et al, 2012;Singh et al, 2018;Mann and Korkut, 2013;Sharaf and Saleh et al, 2015;Sardari et al, 2009;Singh et al, 2015;Manjunatha and Rudraswamy, 2012a, 2012b, 2011aKucuk, 2008;Singh et al, 2010;Kaur et al, 2012;Brar et al, 1994;Brar and Mudahar, 1996;Brar et al, 1998;Manjunatha and Rudraswamy, 2011b). It is also evident from the literature that there are a few researchers who studied energy absorption buildup factors using some other methods such as neural network and MCNP codes (Kucuk et al, 2013;Atak et al, 2015;Kucuk, 2010;Aten Jr., 1978;ANSI/ANS-6.4.3, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%