2017
DOI: 10.1080/13588265.2016.1276118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy-absorption optimisation of locomotives and scaled equivalent model validation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the similarity theory, a one-ninth-scale model of the train is established. 39 The mass of the scaled equivalent model is 135 kg, so the mass of the full-scale car is 98,415 kg, which is close to the mass of a locomotive. The plastic deformation platform force of a honeycomb material is stable, 40,41 and the loading curves of a crushing tube (energy absorber of vehicle) and a honeycomb are shown in Figure 13; thus, an aluminum honeycomb can be used to simulate the energy absorber of vehicle.…”
Section: Scaled Equivalent Model Testmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Based on the similarity theory, a one-ninth-scale model of the train is established. 39 The mass of the scaled equivalent model is 135 kg, so the mass of the full-scale car is 98,415 kg, which is close to the mass of a locomotive. The plastic deformation platform force of a honeycomb material is stable, 40,41 and the loading curves of a crushing tube (energy absorber of vehicle) and a honeycomb are shown in Figure 13; thus, an aluminum honeycomb can be used to simulate the energy absorber of vehicle.…”
Section: Scaled Equivalent Model Testmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Previous studies have found that during a collision, the compression of the moving train is always greater than that of the stationary train; in addition, the first three interfaces of the moving train undergo the maximum EA. 5,29 Thus, during the test, three high-speed cameras were used to record the first three interfaces’ collisions of the moving cars. The centre of each of the first three cars in the moving train was equipped with a longitudinal acceleration sensor.…”
Section: Scaled Equivalent Model Collision Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related studies have shown that moving cars absorb slightly more energy than the stationary cars in both scaled test and simulations. 29 Therefore, statistics are generated only for the deformation of the moving car to obtain the EA of the subway vehicle head and middle cars. When the deformation of one middle car is the highest, its EA can meet the requirements of the other middle cars to absorb energy; thus, the deformation of the HC and the MDMC were considered.…”
Section: Statistics Of the Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Research shows that the energy generated by a rail vehicle collision is extremely large; because the head car is located at the first impact interface, it has a higher demand than the other rail cars in terms of the energy-absorbing capability of the energy-absorbing device. 3538 However, to reduce the aerodynamic drag, the cross-sectional area of the high-speed train is limited. A honeycomb energy-absorbing device should be designed in such a way that it is longer than the traditional energy-absorbing devices, which may lead to bending, destruction and uncontrollable deformation of the honeycomb; these factors are not conducive to energy absorption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%