2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2021.108392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy absorption performance of hexagonal multi-cell tube with hierarchy under axial loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The friction coefficient between the rigid plate and structure was set to 0.15 [18]. The self-contact condition was set to prevent the structures from penetrating each other during compression [38]. To ensure high computational efficiency and high computational accuracy, and to control the system kinetic energy to less than 5%, the mesh was analyzed for convergence and the element size was set to 0.2 mm.…”
Section: Numerical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The friction coefficient between the rigid plate and structure was set to 0.15 [18]. The self-contact condition was set to prevent the structures from penetrating each other during compression [38]. To ensure high computational efficiency and high computational accuracy, and to control the system kinetic energy to less than 5%, the mesh was analyzed for convergence and the element size was set to 0.2 mm.…”
Section: Numerical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, researchers have systematically studied the axial compression performance and energy absorption capabilities of tubular structures with different cross-sections, such as regular circular tubes, 5 square tubes, 6 as well as polygonal tubes, 7,8 through experiments and finite element numerical analysiss. For instance, Researchers such as Koloushani et al 9 and Wu et al 10 have investigated the deformation modes of circular thinwalled tubes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The escalating demand for energy absorbent structures, paired with the need for more efficient use of materials, has led to a wide range of designs in the form of porous sandwiches [6][7][8], honeycomb [6,[9][10][11], and foams [12][13][14][15]. Thin-walled multi-cell columns exhibit excellent mechanical properties and optimal energy absorption when subjected to axial compressive load [16][17][18][19]. Concerning standard honeycomb patterns, despite the possibility to implement hierarchical configurations with tunable mechanical properties, limitations arise when dealing with their high production costs, structural preparation barriers, and limited feasibility in large-scale industrial applications [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%