2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.03.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy analysis of alternative CO 2 refrigeration system configurations for retail food applications in moderate and warm climates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
32
0
7

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
32
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…This assumption has the same order of magnitude as in some other research works including (Tsamos et al, 2017) and (Lozza et al, 2007). This value is also assumed as 3% of gas cooler design capacity in Pack Calculation Pro software, which compares the annual energy use of different refrigeration systems (IPU, 2017).…”
Section: Energy Efficiency Calculations a Computer Model In Ees (Engisupporting
confidence: 50%
“…This assumption has the same order of magnitude as in some other research works including (Tsamos et al, 2017) and (Lozza et al, 2007). This value is also assumed as 3% of gas cooler design capacity in Pack Calculation Pro software, which compares the annual energy use of different refrigeration systems (IPU, 2017).…”
Section: Energy Efficiency Calculations a Computer Model In Ees (Engisupporting
confidence: 50%
“…It is found that COP varies with ambient temperature and work pressure, the higher the external environment temperature, the lower the COP, so it is very clear that application to high temperature environments requires design modifications to increase the COP of the system [2]. Tsamos et al [3] examined several system configurations to be tested at ambient temperatures (warm climate). The results obtained show that a CO2 booster system with hot gas bypass can provide the best performance with 5.0% energy savings for warm climates and 3.65% for moderate climates, followed by an integrated cascade of all CO2 systems with gas bypass compressors, with 3, 6% and 2.1% savings on the reference system for each warm and moderate climate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tsamos [12] compared the performance between booster system with gas bypass compressor and other design (i.e. cascade system with gas bypass), it was found that the booster system gets 5% energy saving in a warm climate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%