2002
DOI: 10.1029/2001ja002002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy analysis of substorms based on remote sensing techniques, solar wind measurements, and geomagnetic indices

Abstract: [1] Observations from the Polar Ionospheric X-ray Imaging Experiment (PIXIE) and the Ultraviolet Imager (UVI) on board the Polar satellite have been used to examine the energy deposition in the Northern Hemisphere by precipitating electrons for seven substorms during 1997. By combining the results from these two remote sensing techniques we derive the 5 min average electron energy distributions from 100 eV to 100 keV with a spatial resolution of $700 km. During growth phase we find that most of the energy is c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
84
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
84
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The data base for this study is the U A derived from UV and X‐ray emissions during 7 isolated substorms which also have been used for another study of the total energy budget of isolated substorms [ Østgaard et al , 2002]. The two imagers, UVI and PIXIE as well as the technique used to derive the electron distribution from 100 eV to 100 keV with a spatial resolution of ∼700 km and a time resolution of 15 min (5 min‐average every 15 min) are described in the companion paper; Østgaard et al [2002] and in Østgaard et al [2001]. To see the time development of U A in different energy ranges as well as the total U A we refer to the companion paper.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The data base for this study is the U A derived from UV and X‐ray emissions during 7 isolated substorms which also have been used for another study of the total energy budget of isolated substorms [ Østgaard et al , 2002]. The two imagers, UVI and PIXIE as well as the technique used to derive the electron distribution from 100 eV to 100 keV with a spatial resolution of ∼700 km and a time resolution of 15 min (5 min‐average every 15 min) are described in the companion paper; Østgaard et al [2002] and in Østgaard et al [2001]. To see the time development of U A in different energy ranges as well as the total U A we refer to the companion paper.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a companion paper [ Østgaard et al , 2002] we show how we can derive the 5 min‐average hemispherically integrated precipitating electron energy distribution from 100 eV to 100 keV ( U A ) using the combined measurements from the imagers on board the Polar spacecraft; the Polar Ionospheric X‐ray Imaging Experiment (PIXIE) [ Imhof et al , 1995] and the Ultraviolet Imager (UVI) [ Torr et al , 1995]. As we believe that the U A derived from UVI and PIXIE gives a fairly precise estimate of the energy deposition by auroral electrons [ Østgaard et al , 2001] the motivation of this study is to contribute with a more accurate estimate of the relation between U A and the geomagnetic indices AE , AL and AU .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of Joule heating rate in the global energy budget has been estimated even as 50-60% (Tanskanen et al, 2002;Østgaard et al, 2002). The global Joule heating rate estimates are typically calculated using different proxy formulas, based e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the fundamental questions in space physics involves the energy coupling between the solar wind and the Earth's magnetosphere. The energy budget during magnetic storms and substorms has been evaluated and presented in several papers in the literature (Akasofu, 1981;Harel et al, 1981;Stern, 1984;Tsurutani and Gonzalez, 1995;Lu et al, 1995Lu et al, , 1998Knipp et al, 1998;Østgaard et al, 2002a). The studies agree that the most important forms of energy dissipation in the near-Earth space are the magnetospheric ring current injection, atmospheric Joule heating and the energy flux carried by precipitating particles.…”
Section: Effects On Energy Budgetmentioning
confidence: 70%