Energy and emissions implications of automated vehicles in the U.S. energy system

Abstract

Vehicle automation has the potential to drastically transform transportation, with important implications for energy and the environment. There is considerable uncertainty regarding the impact of automation on travel demand and vehicle efficiency. We utilize the MARKet ALlocation (MARKAL) energy system model to examine four previously published scenarios that consider different effects of automation on efficiency and demand. We do not replicate detailed estimation of individual mechanisms but apply key outcomes from prior studies within a broader energy system framework. Our analysis adds insights on fuel switching, upstream impacts, and air emissions. MARKAL dynamically captures interactions between transportation and nontransportation sectors, which is important given that the revolutionary shifts from automation may invalidate static assumptions. Model results suggest that increasing travel demands from automation may boost fuel use and petroleum-based fuel prices, potentially increasing the market penetration of alternative-fuel vehicles. In contrast, dramatic efficiency improvements from automation could drive fuel prices lower, greatly reducing the competitiveness of alternativefueled vehicles. Furthermore, these shifts could yield positive or negative environmental impacts. Some automation scenarios even resulted in counterintuitive results. For example, if high levels of efficiency improvement drive out alternative-fuel vehicles, such as battery electric and hybrids, a net worsening of air quality relative to the other scenarios could result. We also found system-level dynamics to be key. For example, reductions in liquid fuel prices led to increased consumption, and the resulting increase in air pollutant emissions offset a portion of the potential air quality benefits of automation.

Toward Human-Centric Transportation and Energy Metrics: Influence of Mode, Vehicle Occupancy, Trip Distance, and Fuel Economy

“…Jones and Leibowicz ( 13 ) explore the value of ensuring higher levels of shared or “pooled” uses of transportation assets. Brown and Dodder ( 14 ) address the uncertainty in travel demand and possible energy and emissions implications of fully connected and automated vehicles, similar to Bush et al ( 7 ), who focus on key levers for more efficient mobility systems, including emphasis on a range of occupancy levels that may be achieved in future automated vehicle trips. Boisjoly and El-Geneidy ( 15 ) and the Committee of the Transport Access Manual ( 16 ) point to accessibility—measured as the ease of reaching valued destinations—as a key land use and transport performance metric.…”

Assessing the Effect of Drivers’ Gender on Their Intention to Use Fully Automated Vehicles

“…One of the most commonly featured benefits of vehicle automation is vehicle energy efficiency [28], explaining an improved potential to transform energy-related dynamics in transport, thus increasing their contribution to both environmental sustainability (including greenhouse emissions) and economy [29,30]. In other words, it is expected a widespread adoption of automated cars might reasonably reduce air pollution and benefit many stakeholders, including drivers, passengers and other road users, especially when involved in large-use transport spheres and services, such as taxis and private hire cars (PHCs) [31].…”

An Air Pollutant Emission Reduction Path of China’s Power Industry

“…In the field of energy and environment, this model shows superiority [26]. It can be utilized to analyze, calculate, and optimize the energy supply, conversion, and demand in an all-round way and is suitable for the research of pollutant emission reduction in the power industry [27]. Therefore, it was decided in this study to construct a system model from specific technical and policy perspectives.…”